MediaTek MT8765B vs Intel Atom x3-C3230RK

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT8765B vs Intel Atom x3-C3230RK, comparison of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-450 MP4.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT8765B is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Atom x3-C3230RK is quad-core (). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software such as PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, GeekBench 6, 5, Octane V2, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, Neocore, GFXBench, PCMark, and how good the CPUs are in games Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy MT8765B or Atom x3-C3230RK and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8765B

Atom x3-C3230RK

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8765B

32%

Atom x3-C3230RK

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8765B

Atom x3-C3230RK

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8765B	Atom x3-C3230RK
Total score	26283	19471
CPU	7350	5444
GPU	9989	7398
MEM	4212	3106
UX	4721	3505

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8765B	Atom x3-C3230RK
Single-Core	69	51
Multi-Core	321	238

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8765B	Atom x3-C3230RK
Frequency	1280 MHz	1100 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.28 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.1 GHz
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR2/3
Max. Memory	4 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	1333
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	2 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8765B is 14% better than Atom x3-C3230RK in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-450 MP4
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	17	35.77
# of Cores	2	4
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 800 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	3.9	6.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	17.8	16.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	9.8	10.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	9.2	9.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	13.4	13.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	23.8	20.3
Real Racing 3	17.2	20.4
Sniper 3D	15.7	16.3
Need for Speed No Limits	15.7	18.4
Mortal Kombat X	14.2	13.3
CSR Racing 2	10.8	11.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem		A-GOLD 620
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	21 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	6 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8765B is better: 18
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x3-C3230RK is better: 15
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips MT8765B and Atom x3-C3230RK, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT8765B SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT8765B specs and review.

Atom x3-C3230RK SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Atom x3-C3230RK specs and review.