|
Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core i9-10885H |
|
Processor comparisons 29-09-2022 For example there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core i9-10885H and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as 7zip, MATLAB, WPrime, UserBenchmark, Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, Blender, Blender, 3DMark, Prime95, PassMark, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, PCMark 10. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10885H or Intel Core i3-N305.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-N305 | 55% |
Core i9-10885H | 54% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-N305 is 1% better than Core i9-10885H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-N305 | 52% |
Core i9-10885H | 54% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 93.1 | 96.5 | Valorant | 105.8 | 109.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.3 | 61.4 | Apex Legends | 99.5 | 103.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.4 | 82.2 | Overwatch | 85.7 | 88.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.0 | 75.6 | DOOM Eternal | 52.9 | 54.8 | Warzone | 82.5 | 85.5 | Assassin's Creed | 88.9 | 92.1 | Valheim | 87.8 | 91.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-N305 | 501% |
Core i9-10885H | 75% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N305 is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10885H since it has less power consumption: 7W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i9-10885H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 225 | 213 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1627 | 1582 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 535 | 493 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3691 | 3542 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1250 | 1105 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 12158 | 10708 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i9-10885H | Single-Core | 2918 | 2917 | Multi-Core | 17887 | 16129 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i9-10885H | Single-Core | 1054 | 1017 | Multi-Core | 5026 | 8304 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i9-10885H | Announcement date | January 26, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1264 | FCBGA1440 | Core name | Alder Lake-N | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 5.3 MHz | Frequency | 1.8 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Threads | 8 | 16 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 9200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 45 W | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 384KB | | L2 cache | 2MB | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 16 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-10885H is 25% better than Core i3-N305 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N305 is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10885H is better: 16 Although it should be understood that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i3-N305 and Intel Core i9-10885H before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-N305 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 5 5560U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i9-10885H Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
| |
|