|
Intel Core i9-10885H vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|
Processor comparisons 24-03-2021 For example there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i9-10885H vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and understand which is better for games or simple use for programming, machine learning, streaming, rendering, video editing. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like PCMark 10, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, 7zip, AIDA64, Prime95, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, RealBench, Furmark, 3DMark, UserBenchmark, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, WPrime. Gaming performance of processors in: - Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X or Intel Core i9-10885H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-10885H | 54% |
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | 55% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1% better than Core i9-10885H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-10885H | 54% |
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | 54% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 96.5 | 96.0 | Valorant | 109.6 | 109.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.4 | 61.1 | Apex Legends | 103.0 | 102.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.2 | 81.8 | Overwatch | 88.8 | 88.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.6 | 75.3 | DOOM Eternal | 54.8 | 54.6 | Warzone | 85.5 | 85.1 | Assassin's Creed | 92.1 | 91.7 | Valheim | 91.0 | 90.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-10885H | 75% |
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | 19% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-10885H is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 180W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-10885H |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 213 | 168 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1582 | 1709 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 493 | 403 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3542 | 3678 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1105 | 654 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 10708 | 11884 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-10885H |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Single-Core | 2917 | 2345 | Multi-Core | 16129 | 16825 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-10885H |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Single-Core | 1017 | 1055 | Multi-Core | 8304 | 7864 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-10885H |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | August 31, 2017 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1440 | sTR4 | Core name | Comet Lake | Whitehaven | Architecture | x86 | Zen | Generation | 10 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Threads | 16 | 16 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 9200 millions | 11600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 180 W | Memory type | DDR4-2933 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 2667 | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 768KB | L2 cache | | 4MB | L3 cache | 16 MB | 16MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | YD190XA8U8QAE YD190XA8AEWOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 36% better than Core i9-10885H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10885H is better: 23
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is better: 12 However, it should be realized that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i9-10885H and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-10885H Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
| |
|