 |
Intel Core i3-1315U vs Intel Core i9-10885H |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023
If there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-1315U vs Intel Core i9-10885H and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning, rendering. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Gears 5, Furmark, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, Blender, PassMark, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, SuperPi, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, AIDA64, MATLAB.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10885H or Intel Core i3-1315U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-1315U | 58% |
Core i9-10885H | 54% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-1315U is 6% better than Core i9-10885H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-1315U | 54% |
Core i9-10885H | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 95.7 | 96.5 | | Valorant | 108.7 | 109.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.9 | 61.4 | | Apex Legends | 102.2 | 103.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.6 | 82.2 | | Overwatch | 88.1 | 88.8 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.0 | 75.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.4 | 54.8 | | Warzone | 84.8 | 85.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 91.3 | 92.1 | | Valheim | 90.2 | 91.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-1315U | 400% |
Core i9-10885H | 75% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1315U is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10885H since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-1315U |
Intel Core i9-10885H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 243 | 213 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2487 | 1582 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 403 | 493 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5520 | 3542 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1404 | 1105 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 15866 | 10708 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1315U |
Intel Core i9-10885H | | Single-Core | 1282 | 2917 | | Multi-Core | 27041 | 16129 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1315U |
Intel Core i9-10885H | | Single-Core | 1803 | 1017 | | Multi-Core | 7535 | 8304 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-1315U |
Intel Core i9-10885H | | Announcement date | January 20, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 5.3 MHz | | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 8 | | Threads | 8 | 16 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 9200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 10 MB | 16 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-1315U is 27% better than Core i9-10885H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-10885H has 2 more core than Core i3-1315U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1315U is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10885H is better: 20
Although it should be understood that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-1315U and Intel Core i9-10885H before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-1315U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i9-10885H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
|
|
|
