|
Intel Core i7-13800H vs Intel Core i3-N305 |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i7-13800H vs Intel Core i3-N305 tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering. Here you can find all information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like UserBenchmark, WPrime, Handbrake, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, PassMark, Furmark, AIDA64, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, RealBench. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-N305 or Intel Core i7-13800H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-13800H | 59% |
Core i3-N305 | 55% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-13800H is 6% better than Core i3-N305. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-13800H | 58% |
Core i3-N305 | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 102.2 | 93.1 | Valorant | 116.2 | 105.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.1 | 59.3 | Apex Legends | 109.2 | 99.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 87.1 | 79.4 | Overwatch | 94.1 | 85.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 80.2 | 73.0 | DOOM Eternal | 58.1 | 52.9 | Warzone | 90.6 | 82.5 | Assassin's Creed | 97.6 | 88.9 | Valheim | 96.4 | 87.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-13800H | 140% |
Core i3-N305 | 501% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N305 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-13800H as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 7W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13800H |
Intel Core i3-N305 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 295 | 225 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2867 | 1627 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 476 | 535 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6345 | 3691 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1623 | 1250 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18210 | 12158 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13800H |
Intel Core i3-N305 | Single-Core | 1486 | 2918 | Multi-Core | 31020 | 17887 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13800H |
Intel Core i3-N305 | Single-Core | 1903 | 1054 | Multi-Core | 13966 | 5026 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-13800H |
Intel Core i3-N305 | Announcement date | January 28, 2023 | January 26, 2023 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1264 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake-N | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Frequency | 4 MHz | 1.8 MHz | Cores | 14 | 8 | Threads | 20 | 8 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 7 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 384KB | L2 cache | 8 MB | 2MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13800H is 55% better than Core i3-N305 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-13800H has 6 more core than Core i3-N305. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13800H is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N305 is better: 6 However, it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i7-13800H and Intel Core i3-N305 before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-13800H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i3-N305 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 5 5560U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
| |
|