|
Intel Core i3-N305 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3500C |
|
Processor comparisons 29-09-2022 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-N305 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3500C and understand which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, video editing, programming, streaming. Here you can find useful information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Gears 5, 3DMark, UserBenchmark, SuperPi, WPrime, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, 7zip, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Blender, AIDA64, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, Handbrake. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 5 3500C or Intel Core i3-N305.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-N305 | 55% |
Ryzen 5 3500C | 52% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-N305 is 5% better than Ryzen 5 3500C. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-N305 | 52% |
Ryzen 5 3500C | 51% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 93.1 | 91.1 | Valorant | 105.8 | 103.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.3 | 58.0 | Apex Legends | 99.5 | 97.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.4 | 77.7 | Overwatch | 85.7 | 83.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.0 | 71.4 | DOOM Eternal | 52.9 | 51.8 | Warzone | 82.5 | 80.8 | Assassin's Creed | 88.9 | 87.0 | Valheim | 87.8 | 85.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-N305 | 501% |
Ryzen 5 3500C | 195% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N305 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 3500C since it has less power consumption: 7W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
AMD Ryzen 5 3500C | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 225 | 140 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1627 | 614 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 535 | 356 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3691 | 1468 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1250 | 867 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 12158 | 3509 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
AMD Ryzen 5 3500C | Single-Core | 2918 | 1994 | Multi-Core | 17887 | 7127 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
AMD Ryzen 5 3500C | Single-Core | 1054 | 881 | Multi-Core | 5026 | 3057 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-N305 |
AMD Ryzen 5 3500C | Announcement date | January 26, 2023 | September 22, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1264 | FP5 | Core name | Alder Lake-N | Picasso | Architecture | x86 | Zen+ | Generation | 13 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Frequency | 1.8 MHz | 2.1 MHz | Cores | 8 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 4200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 15 W | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 2400 | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 384KB | 384KB | L2 cache | 2MB | 2MB | L3 cache | 6 MB | 4MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| YM350CC4T4MFG
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 3500C is 14% better than Core i3-N305 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-N305 has 4 more core than Ryzen 5 3500C. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N305 is better: 32
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 3500C is better: 2 However, it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i3-N305 and AMD Ryzen 5 3500C before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-N305 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 5 5560U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
AMD Ryzen 5 3500C Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
| |
|