|
Intel Core i3-1305U vs Intel Core i9-10885H |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023 If there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-1305U vs Intel Core i9-10885H and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Handbrake, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, Blender, 3DMark, Blender, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, RealBench, AIDA64, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, Prime95. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10885H or Intel Core i3-1305U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-1305U | 57% |
Core i9-10885H | 54% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-1305U is 5% better than Core i9-10885H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-1305U | 54% |
Core i9-10885H | 54% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 95.1 | 96.5 | Valorant | 108.1 | 109.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.5 | 61.4 | Apex Legends | 101.6 | 103.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.0 | 82.2 | Overwatch | 87.5 | 88.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.6 | 75.6 | DOOM Eternal | 54.0 | 54.8 | Warzone | 84.3 | 85.5 | Assassin's Creed | 90.8 | 92.1 | Valheim | 89.7 | 91.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-1305U | 369% |
Core i9-10885H | 75% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1305U is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10885H as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
Intel Core i9-10885H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 224 | 213 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2295 | 1582 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 372 | 493 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5093 | 3542 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1295 | 1105 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14639 | 10708 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
Intel Core i9-10885H | Single-Core | 1182 | 2917 | Multi-Core | 24951 | 16129 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
Intel Core i9-10885H | Single-Core | 1663 | 1017 | Multi-Core | 6952 | 8304 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-1305U |
Intel Core i9-10885H | Announcement date | January 15, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1440 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 5.3 MHz | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Cores | 5 | 8 | Threads | 6 | 16 | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 9200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 10 MB | 16 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-1305U is 27% better than Core i9-10885H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-10885H has 3 more core than Core i3-1305U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1305U is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10885H is better: 20 However, it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-1305U and Intel Core i9-10885H before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-1305U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i9-10885H Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
| |
|