 |
Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core i5-13500HX |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core i5-13500HX and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, programming, machine learning, rendering, video editing. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, VeraCrypt, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, Blender, AIDA64, WPrime, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, 7zip, Prime95, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, SuperPi, Blender, MATLAB.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Overwatch
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-13500HX or Intel Core i3-N305.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-N305 | 55% |
Core i5-13500HX | 58% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13500HX is 5% better than Core i3-N305. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-N305 | 52% |
Core i5-13500HX | 57% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 93.1 | 101.1 | | Valorant | 105.8 | 114.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.3 | 64.3 | | Apex Legends | 99.5 | 108.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.4 | 86.2 | | Overwatch | 85.7 | 93.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.0 | 79.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.9 | 57.4 | | Warzone | 82.5 | 89.6 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.9 | 96.5 | | Valheim | 87.8 | 95.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-N305 | 501% |
Core i5-13500HX | 173% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N305 is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13500HX as it consumes less power: 7W vs. 38W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i5-13500HX | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 225 | 279 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1627 | 2710 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 535 | 451 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3691 | 5999 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1250 | 1535 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 12158 | 17212 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i5-13500HX | | Single-Core | 2918 | 1406 | | Multi-Core | 17887 | 29320 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i5-13500HX | | Single-Core | 1054 | 1975 | | Multi-Core | 5026 | 12829 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i5-13500HX | | Announcement date | January 26, 2023 | December 12, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1264 | FCBGA1744 | | Core name | Alder Lake-N | Raptor Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 13 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 1.8 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 14 | | Threads | 8 | 20 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 14200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 38 W | | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | DDR4 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s | | L1 cache | 384KB | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 2MB | 6 MB | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 44 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13500HX is 25% better than Core i3-N305 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13500HX has 6 more core than Core i3-N305. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N305 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13500HX is better: 29
Although it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-N305 and Intel Core i5-13500HX before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-N305 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i5-13500HX Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
|
|
|
