|
Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core i3-1215UL |
|
Processor comparisons 29-09-2022 For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the full tests Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core i3-1215UL and understand which is better for games or normal use for rendering, streaming, machine learning, video editing, programming. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as 3DMark, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Handbrake, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, MATLAB, Gears 5, RealBench, Prime95, AIDA64, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, 7zip, Blender. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-1215UL or Intel Core i3-N305.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-N305 | 55% |
Core i3-1215UL | 54% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-N305 is 1% better than Core i3-1215UL. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-N305 | 52% |
Core i3-1215UL | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Control, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 93.1 | 94.4 | Valorant | 105.8 | 107.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.3 | 60.1 | Apex Legends | 99.5 | 100.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.4 | 80.5 | Overwatch | 85.7 | 86.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.0 | 74.1 | DOOM Eternal | 52.9 | 53.7 | Warzone | 82.5 | 83.7 | Assassin's Creed | 88.9 | 90.2 | Valheim | 87.8 | 89.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-N305 | 501% |
Core i3-1215UL | 251% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N305 is more energy efficient than the Core i3-1215UL since it has less power consumption: 7W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i3-1215UL | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 225 | 204 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1627 | 1534 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 535 | 499 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3691 | 3492 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1250 | 1176 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 12158 | 11522 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i3-1215UL | Single-Core | 2918 | 2759 | Multi-Core | 17887 | 16133 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i3-1215UL | Single-Core | 1054 | 1133 | Multi-Core | 5026 | 6323 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i3-1215UL | Announcement date | January 26, 2023 | September 24, 2022 | Type | Laptop | Embedded | Socket | FCBGA1264 | FCBGA1744 | Core name | Alder Lake-N | Alder Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 4.4 MHz | Frequency | 1.8 MHz | 1.2 MHz | Cores | 8 | 6 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 9800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 15 W | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 384KB | | L2 cache | 2MB | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 10 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-N305 is 33% better than Core i3-1215UL in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-N305 has 2 more core than Core i3-1215UL. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N305 is better: 16
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1215UL is better: 15 Although it should be realized that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-N305 and Intel Core i3-1215UL before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-N305 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 5 5560U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i3-1215UL Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i3-N300
| |
|