 |
Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core i7-13705H |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core i7-13705H and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, machine learning, programming, video editing, streaming. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Blender, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, Prime95, MATLAB, PCMark 10, SuperPi, Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, WPrime, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, Handbrake, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, 3DMark.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-13705H or Intel Core i3-N305.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-N305 | 55% |
Core i7-13705H | 58% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-13705H is 5% better than Core i3-N305. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-N305 | 52% |
Core i7-13705H | 57% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 93.1 | 101.4 | | Valorant | 105.8 | 115.3 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.3 | 64.5 | | Apex Legends | 99.5 | 108.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.4 | 86.4 | | Overwatch | 85.7 | 93.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.0 | 79.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.9 | 57.6 | | Warzone | 82.5 | 89.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.9 | 96.8 | | Valheim | 87.8 | 95.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-N305 | 501% |
Core i7-13705H | 133% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N305 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-13705H as it consumes less power: 7W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i7-13705H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 225 | 280 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1627 | 2705 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 535 | 452 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3691 | 5982 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1250 | 1532 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 12158 | 17163 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i7-13705H | | Single-Core | 2918 | 1403 | | Multi-Core | 17887 | 29234 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i7-13705H | | Single-Core | 1054 | 1796 | | Multi-Core | 5026 | 13164 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i7-13705H | | Announcement date | January 26, 2023 | January 26, 2023 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1264 | FCBGA1792 | | Core name | Alder Lake-N | Raptor Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 13 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 5 MHz | | Frequency | 1.8 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 14 | | Threads | 8 | 20 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 14200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 45 W | | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 384KB | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 2MB | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 24 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13705H is 51% better than Core i3-N305 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-13705H has 6 more core than Core i3-N305. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N305 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13705H is better: 28
Although it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-N305 and Intel Core i7-13705H before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-N305 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i7-13705H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
|
|
|
