 |
Intel Core i9-13905H vs Intel Core i9-10885H |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i9-13905H vs Intel Core i9-10885H and see which is better for games or simple use for streaming, machine learning, video editing, rendering, programming. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, Prime95, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, PassMark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, PCMark 10, 7zip, WPrime, Handbrake, Blender, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark.
And how good the processors are in games: - Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10885H or Intel Core i9-13905H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-13905H | 59% |
Core i9-10885H | 54% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13905H is 8% better than Core i9-10885H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-13905H | 58% |
Core i9-10885H | 54% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 103.5 | 96.5 | | Valorant | 117.7 | 109.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.9 | 61.4 | | Apex Legends | 110.6 | 103.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.2 | 82.2 | | Overwatch | 95.3 | 88.8 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.2 | 75.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.8 | 54.8 | | Warzone | 91.8 | 85.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 98.8 | 92.1 | | Valheim | 97.7 | 91.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-13905H | 141% |
Core i9-10885H | 75% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13905H is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10885H as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-10885H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 317 | 213 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3013 | 1582 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 508 | 493 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6656 | 3542 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1709 | 1105 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 19084 | 10708 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-10885H | | Single-Core | 1564 | 2917 | | Multi-Core | 32503 | 16129 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-10885H | | Single-Core | 1907 | 1017 | | Multi-Core | 15235 | 8304 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-13905H |
Intel Core i9-10885H | | Announcement date | January 17, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 MHz | 5.3 MHz | | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 8 | | Threads | 20 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 45 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 16 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13905H is 41% better than Core i9-10885H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13905H has 6 more core than Core i9-10885H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13905H is better: 33
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10885H is better: 3
Although it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i9-13905H and Intel Core i9-10885H before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-13905H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i9-10885H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
|
|
|
