 |
Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core i5-13500H |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core i5-13500H and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, machine learning, video editing, programming, streaming. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Blender, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, Prime95, Blender, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, WPrime, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, 7zip, Gears 5, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, SuperPi.
And how good the processors are in games: - Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-13500H or Intel Core i3-N305.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-N305 | 55% |
Core i5-13500H | 57% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13500H is 3% better than Core i3-N305. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-N305 | 52% |
Core i5-13500H | 56% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 93.1 | 99.0 | | Valorant | 105.8 | 112.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.3 | 63.0 | | Apex Legends | 99.5 | 105.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.4 | 84.4 | | Overwatch | 85.7 | 91.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.0 | 77.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.9 | 56.2 | | Warzone | 82.5 | 87.7 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.9 | 94.5 | | Valheim | 87.8 | 93.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-N305 | 501% |
Core i5-13500H | 123% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N305 is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13500H as it consumes less power: 7W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i5-13500H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 225 | 249 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1627 | 2288 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 535 | 393 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3691 | 5045 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1250 | 1302 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 12158 | 14449 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i5-13500H | | Single-Core | 2918 | 1193 | | Multi-Core | 17887 | 24604 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i5-13500H | | Single-Core | 1054 | 1670 | | Multi-Core | 5026 | 10773 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i5-13500H | | Announcement date | January 26, 2023 | January 21, 2023 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1264 | FCBGA1744 | | Core name | Alder Lake-N | Raptor Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 13 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 4.7 MHz | | Frequency | 1.8 MHz | 3.5 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 12 | | Threads | 8 | 16 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 14200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 45 W | | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s | | L1 cache | 384KB | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 2MB | 6 MB | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 18 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13500H is 48% better than Core i3-N305 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13500H has 4 more core than Core i3-N305. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N305 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13500H is better: 28
Although it should be realized that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-N305 and Intel Core i5-13500H before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-N305 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i5-13500H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
