 |
Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core i7-1068NG7 |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core i7-1068NG7 tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, SuperPi, Gears 5, WPrime, Blender, Furmark, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, Blender, 7zip, Handbrake, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, PCMark 10, AIDA64, MATLAB.
And how good the processors are in games: - Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-1068NG7 or Intel Core i3-N305.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-N305 | 55% |
Core i7-1068NG7 | 53% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-N305 is 3% better than Core i7-1068NG7. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-N305 | 52% |
Core i7-1068NG7 | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 93.1 | 93.0 | | Valorant | 105.8 | 105.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.3 | 59.2 | | Apex Legends | 99.5 | 99.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.4 | 79.3 | | Overwatch | 85.7 | 85.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.0 | 72.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.9 | 52.8 | | Warzone | 82.5 | 82.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.9 | 88.8 | | Valheim | 87.8 | 87.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-N305 | 501% |
Core i7-1068NG7 | 159% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N305 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-1068NG7 as it consumes less power: 7W vs. 28W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i7-1068NG7 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 225 | 193 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1627 | | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 535 | 461 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3691 | 1756 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1250 | 1249 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 12158 | |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i7-1068NG7 | | Single-Core | 2918 | 2613 | | Multi-Core | 17887 | 10763 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i7-1068NG7 | | Single-Core | 1054 | 1339 | | Multi-Core | 5026 | 4894 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i7-1068NG7 | | Announcement date | January 26, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1264 | FCBGA1344 | | Core name | Alder Lake-N | Ice Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 4.1 MHz | | Frequency | 1.8 MHz | 2.3 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Threads | 8 | 8 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 6800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 28 W | | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 58.3 GB/s | | L1 cache | 384KB | | | L2 cache | 2MB | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-1068NG7 is 21% better than Core i3-N305 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-N305 has 4 more core than Core i7-1068NG7. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N305 is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-1068NG7 is better: 6
Although it should be realized that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i3-N305 and Intel Core i7-1068NG7 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-N305 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i7-1068NG7 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i7-8700B
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
|
|
|
