 |
Intel Core i7-13800H vs Intel Core i9-10885H |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i7-13800H vs Intel Core i9-10885H and understand which is better for games or normal use for programming, machine learning, video editing, streaming, rendering. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like VeraCrypt, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Prime95, MATLAB, PCMark 10, AIDA64, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, Furmark, Gears 5, 3DMark, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, RealBench, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark.
Gaming performance of processors in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10885H or Intel Core i7-13800H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-13800H | 59% |
Core i9-10885H | 54% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-13800H is 8% better than Core i9-10885H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-13800H | 58% |
Core i9-10885H | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Control, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 102.2 | 96.5 | | Valorant | 116.2 | 109.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.1 | 61.4 | | Apex Legends | 109.2 | 103.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 87.1 | 82.2 | | Overwatch | 94.1 | 88.8 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 80.2 | 75.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.1 | 54.8 | | Warzone | 90.6 | 85.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 97.6 | 92.1 | | Valheim | 96.4 | 91.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-13800H | 140% |
Core i9-10885H | 75% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-13800H is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10885H as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13800H |
Intel Core i9-10885H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 295 | 213 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2867 | 1582 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 476 | 493 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6345 | 3542 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1623 | 1105 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18210 | 10708 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13800H |
Intel Core i9-10885H | | Single-Core | 1486 | 2917 | | Multi-Core | 31020 | 16129 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13800H |
Intel Core i9-10885H | | Single-Core | 1903 | 1017 | | Multi-Core | 13966 | 8304 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-13800H |
Intel Core i9-10885H | | Announcement date | January 28, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 5.3 MHz | | Frequency | 4 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 8 | | Threads | 20 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 45 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 16 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13800H is 40% better than Core i9-10885H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-13800H has 6 more core than Core i9-10885H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13800H is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10885H is better: 5
Although it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i7-13800H and Intel Core i9-10885H before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-13800H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i9-10885H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
|
|
|
