 |
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Intel Core i3-N305 |
|
Processor comparisons 15-02-2023 If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the full tests AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Intel Core i3-N305 and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, video editing, programming, rendering. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, WPrime, PCMark 10, 7zip, SuperPi, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, PassMark, Prime95, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, Blender, Gears 5, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark. And how good the processors are in games: - Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-N305 or AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 9 7940HS | 64% |
Core i3-N305 | 55% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 9 7940HS is 14% better than Core i3-N305. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 9 7940HS | 61% |
Core i3-N305 | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 107.5 | 93.1 | Valorant | 122.1 | 105.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 68.4 | 59.3 | Apex Legends | 114.8 | 99.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 91.6 | 79.4 | Overwatch | 98.9 | 85.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 84.3 | 73.0 | DOOM Eternal | 61.1 | 52.9 | Warzone | 95.2 | 82.5 | Assassin's Creed | 102.6 | 88.9 | Valheim | 101.4 | 87.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 9 7940HS | 165% |
Core i3-N305 | 501% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N305 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 9 7940HS as it consumes less power: 40W vs. 7W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
Intel Core i3-N305 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 293 | 225 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4426 | 1627 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 667 | 535 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10551 | 3691 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1669 | 1250 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 28954 | 12158 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
Intel Core i3-N305 | Single-Core | 3505 | 2918 | Multi-Core | 46681 | 17887 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
Intel Core i3-N305 | Single-Core | 1986 | 1054 | Multi-Core | 19074 | 5026 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
Intel Core i3-N305 | Announcement date | January 27, 2023 | January 26, 2023 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FP7r2;FP7;FP8 | FCBGA1264 | Core name | Phoenix | Alder Lake-N | Architecture | Zen 4 | x86 | Generation | 6 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Frequency | 4 MHz | 1.8 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Threads | 16 | 8 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 13400 millions | 9800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 40 W | 7 W | Memory type | DDR5 (FP7r2) LPDDR5/x (FP7, FP8) | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | Max. Memory | 256 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 7500 | | Memory bandwidth | | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 512KB | 384KB | L2 cache | 8MB | 2MB | L3 cache | 16MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | 100-000000954 (FP7r2) 100-000000963 (FP7) 100-000001128 (FP8)
| Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 9 7940HS is 55% better than Core i3-N305 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS is better: 32
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N305 is better: 5 All the figures in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS and Intel Core i3-N305 before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i3-N305 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 5 5560U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
| |
|