 |
Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core i3-1315U |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core i3-1315U tests and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, video editing, programming, rendering, streaming. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Furmark, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, PCMark 10, WPrime, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, Blender, Gears 5, 7zip, RealBench, MATLAB, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15).
And how good the processors are in games: - Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-1315U or Intel Core i3-N305.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-N305 | 55% |
Core i3-1315U | 58% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-1315U is 5% better than Core i3-N305. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-N305 | 52% |
Core i3-1315U | 54% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 93.1 | 95.7 | | Valorant | 105.8 | 108.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.3 | 60.9 | | Apex Legends | 99.5 | 102.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.4 | 81.6 | | Overwatch | 85.7 | 88.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.0 | 75.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.9 | 54.4 | | Warzone | 82.5 | 84.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.9 | 91.3 | | Valheim | 87.8 | 90.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-N305 | 501% |
Core i3-1315U | 400% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N305 is more energy efficient than the Core i3-1315U as it consumes less power: 7W vs. 15W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i3-1315U | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 225 | 243 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1627 | 2487 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 535 | 403 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3691 | 5520 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1250 | 1404 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 12158 | 15866 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i3-1315U | | Single-Core | 2918 | 1282 | | Multi-Core | 17887 | 27041 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i3-1315U | | Single-Core | 1054 | 1803 | | Multi-Core | 5026 | 7535 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i3-1315U | | Announcement date | January 26, 2023 | January 20, 2023 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1264 | FCBGA1744 | | Core name | Alder Lake-N | Raptor Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 13 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 4.5 MHz | | Frequency | 1.8 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 6 | | Threads | 8 | 8 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 14 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 12400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 15 W | | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 68 GB/s | | L1 cache | 384KB | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 2MB | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 10 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-1315U is 45% better than Core i3-N305 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-N305 has 2 more core than Core i3-1315U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N305 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1315U is better: 26
However, it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-N305 and Intel Core i3-1315U before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-N305 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i3-1315U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
