 |
Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core i7-13700H |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
For example you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core i7-13700H and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like SuperPi, Blender, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Gears 5, MATLAB, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, WPrime, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, Furmark, AIDA64.
And how good the processors are in games: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-13700H or Intel Core i3-N305.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-N305 | 55% |
Core i7-13700H | 58% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-13700H is 5% better than Core i3-N305. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-N305 | 52% |
Core i7-13700H | 57% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Battlefield V, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 93.1 | 101.0 | | Valorant | 105.8 | 114.8 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.3 | 64.3 | | Apex Legends | 99.5 | 107.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.4 | 86.1 | | Overwatch | 85.7 | 93.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.0 | 79.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.9 | 57.4 | | Warzone | 82.5 | 89.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.9 | 96.4 | | Valheim | 87.8 | 95.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-N305 | 501% |
Core i7-13700H | 128% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N305 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-13700H as it consumes less power: 7W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i7-13700H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 225 | 265 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1627 | 2619 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 535 | 432 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3691 | 5801 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1250 | 1481 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 12158 | 16656 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i7-13700H | | Single-Core | 2918 | 1355 | | Multi-Core | 17887 | 28376 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i7-13700H | | Single-Core | 1054 | 1737 | | Multi-Core | 5026 | 12774 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i7-13700H | | Announcement date | January 26, 2023 | November 12, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1264 | FCBGA1744 | | Core name | Alder Lake-N | Raptor Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 13 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 5 MHz | | Frequency | 1.8 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 14 | | Threads | 8 | 20 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 14200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 45 W | | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 384KB | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 2MB | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 30 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13700H is 25% better than Core i3-N305 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-13700H has 6 more core than Core i3-N305. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N305 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13700H is better: 29
All the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i3-N305 and Intel Core i7-13700H before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-N305 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i7-13700H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i7-12700TE
• Vs Core i7-12700HE
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i7-12700E
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i5-12600HE
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i5-12600HL
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i9-13700HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
|
|
|
