 |
Intel Core i5-1340P vs Intel Core i3-N305 |
|
Processor comparisons 01-01-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-1340P vs Intel Core i3-N305 and understand which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, video editing, rendering, programming, streaming. Here you can find useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, 7zip, UserBenchmark, Blender, Handbrake, MATLAB, SuperPi, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, VeraCrypt, PassMark, RealBench, 3DMark, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-N305 or Intel Core i5-1340P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-1340P | 56% |
Core i3-N305 | 55% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-1340P is 1% better than Core i3-N305. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-1340P | 55% |
Core i3-N305 | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 97.2 | 93.1 | | Valorant | 110.5 | 105.8 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.9 | 59.3 | | Apex Legends | 103.9 | 99.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.9 | 79.4 | | Overwatch | 89.5 | 85.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 76.2 | 73.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 55.3 | 52.9 | | Warzone | 86.2 | 82.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 92.8 | 88.9 | | Valheim | 91.7 | 87.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-1340P | 187% |
Core i3-N305 | 501% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N305 is more energy efficient than the Core i5-1340P as it consumes less power: 28W vs. 7W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-1340P |
Intel Core i3-N305 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 272 | 225 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2000 | 1627 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 655 | 535 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4545 | 3691 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1533 | 1250 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14988 | 12158 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1340P |
Intel Core i3-N305 | | Single-Core | 3593 | 2918 | | Multi-Core | 20983 | 17887 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1340P |
Intel Core i3-N305 | | Single-Core | 1577 | 1054 | | Multi-Core | 9062 | 5026 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-1340P |
Intel Core i3-N305 | | Announcement date | March 27, 2023 | January 26, 2023 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1264 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake-N | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 13 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 3.8 MHz | | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 1.8 MHz | | Cores | 12 | 8 | | Threads | 16 | 8 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 9800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 28 W | 7 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 384KB | | L2 cache | | 2MB | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 6 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-1340P is 47% better than Core i3-N305 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-1340P has 4 more core than Core i3-N305. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-1340P is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N305 is better: 4
However, it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-1340P and Intel Core i3-N305 before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-1340P Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i3-N305 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
