 |
Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core i7-8086K |
|
Processor comparisons 29-09-2022
Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core i7-8086K and see which is better for games or normal use for programming, streaming, rendering, video editing, machine learning. Here you can find all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as MATLAB, Handbrake, AIDA64, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, PCMark 10, RealBench, Furmark, 7zip, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, PassMark, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15).
And how good the processors are in games: - Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-8086K or Intel Core i3-N305.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-N305 | 55% |
Core i7-8086K | 54% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-N305 is 1% better than Core i7-8086K. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-N305 | 52% |
Core i7-8086K | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 93.1 | 96.2 | | Valorant | 105.8 | 109.3 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.3 | 61.2 | | Apex Legends | 99.5 | 102.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.4 | 82.0 | | Overwatch | 85.7 | 88.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.0 | 75.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.9 | 54.7 | | Warzone | 82.5 | 85.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.9 | 91.8 | | Valheim | 87.8 | 90.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-N305 | 501% |
Core i7-8086K | 50% |
To make a final choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N305 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-8086K as it consumes less power: 7W vs. 95W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i7-8086K | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 225 | 219 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1627 | 1448 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 535 | 467 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3691 | 3292 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1250 | 1321 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 12158 | 10209 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i7-8086K | | Single-Core | 2918 | 2896 | | Multi-Core | 17887 | 14705 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i7-8086K | | Single-Core | 1054 | 1427 | | Multi-Core | 5026 | 8056 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i7-8086K | | Announcement date | January 26, 2023 | April 01, 2018 | | Type | Laptop | Desktop | | Socket | FCBGA1264 | FCLGA1151-2 | | Core name | Alder Lake-N | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 8 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 5 MHz | | Frequency | 1.8 MHz | 4 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 6 | | Threads | 8 | 12 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 3600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 95 W | | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 384KB | | | L2 cache | 2MB | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-8086K is 55% better than Core i3-N305 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-N305 has 2 more core than Core i7-8086K. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N305 is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-8086K is better: 18
However, it should be understood that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-N305 and Intel Core i7-8086K before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-N305 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i7-8086K Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
|
|
|
