|
Intel Core i9-10885H vs Intel Core i7-10700 |
|
Processor comparisons 24-03-2021 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i9-10885H vs Intel Core i7-10700 and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, streaming, video editing, machine learning, rendering. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, Handbrake, WPrime, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, Blender, 3DMark, 7zip, Blender, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, PassMark. And how good the processors are in games: - Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-10700 or Intel Core i9-10885H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-10885H | 54% |
Core i7-10700 | 55% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-10700 is 1% better than Core i9-10885H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-10885H | 54% |
Core i7-10700 | 55% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 96.5 | 97.3 | Valorant | 109.6 | 110.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.4 | 61.9 | Apex Legends | 103.0 | 104.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.2 | 83.0 | Overwatch | 88.8 | 89.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.6 | 76.3 | DOOM Eternal | 54.8 | 55.3 | Warzone | 85.5 | 86.3 | Assassin's Creed | 92.1 | 92.9 | Valheim | 91.0 | 91.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-10885H | 75% |
Core i7-10700 | 67% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-10885H is more energy efficient than the Core i7-10700 since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-10885H |
Intel Core i7-10700 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 213 | 221 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1582 | 2356 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 493 | 513 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3542 | 4971 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1105 | 1290 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 10708 | 12595 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-10885H |
Intel Core i7-10700 | Single-Core | 2917 | 3055 | Multi-Core | 16129 | 17916 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-10885H |
Intel Core i7-10700 | Single-Core | 1017 | 1325 | Multi-Core | 8304 | 9163 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-10885H |
Intel Core i7-10700 | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1440 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Comet Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 10 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 MHz | 4.8 MHz | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 2.9 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Threads | 16 | 16 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 9200 millions | 6800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 16 MB | 16 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-10700 is 17% better than Core i9-10885H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10885H is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-10700 is better: 23 However, it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i9-10885H and Intel Core i7-10700 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-10885H Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
Intel Core i7-10700 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 5 1500X • Vs Core i3-7100 • Vs Core i7-5820K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|