|
Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core i7-10870H |
|
Processor comparisons 29-09-2022 If there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Core i7-10870H and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, rendering. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, AIDA64, PassMark, Blender, WPrime, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, Handbrake, 3DMark, SuperPi, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, VeraCrypt, RealBench, Blender, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-10870H or Intel Core i3-N305.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-N305 | 55% |
Core i7-10870H | 54% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-N305 is 1% better than Core i7-10870H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-N305 | 52% |
Core i7-10870H | 54% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Control.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 93.1 | 96.0 | Valorant | 105.8 | 109.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.3 | 61.1 | Apex Legends | 99.5 | 102.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.4 | 81.8 | Overwatch | 85.7 | 88.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.0 | 75.3 | DOOM Eternal | 52.9 | 54.5 | Warzone | 82.5 | 85.1 | Assassin's Creed | 88.9 | 91.6 | Valheim | 87.8 | 90.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-N305 | 501% |
Core i7-10870H | 94% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N305 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-10870H since it has less power consumption: 7W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i7-10870H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 225 | 208 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1627 | 1522 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 535 | 499 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3691 | 3457 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1250 | 1167 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 12158 | 11396 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i7-10870H | Single-Core | 2918 | 2734 | Multi-Core | 17887 | 15954 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i7-10870H | Single-Core | 1054 | 1271 | Multi-Core | 5026 | 7816 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-N305 |
Intel Core i7-10870H | Announcement date | January 26, 2023 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1264 | FCBGA1440 | Core name | Alder Lake-N | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 5 MHz | Frequency | 1.8 MHz | 2.2 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Threads | 8 | 16 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 6800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 45 W | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 384KB | | L2 cache | 2MB | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 16 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-10870H is 18% better than Core i3-N305 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N305 is better: 16
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-10870H is better: 18 However, it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-N305 and Intel Core i7-10870H before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-N305 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 5 5560U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i7-10870H Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
| |
|