 |
Intel Core i5-1340P vs Intel Core i9-10885H |
|
Processor comparisons 01-01-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-1340P vs Intel Core i9-10885H and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, rendering, programming, video editing, machine learning. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, PassMark, Blender, Blender, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, Prime95, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, PCMark 10, Handbrake, SuperPi, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10885H or Intel Core i5-1340P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-1340P | 56% |
Core i9-10885H | 54% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-1340P is 3% better than Core i9-10885H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-1340P | 55% |
Core i9-10885H | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 97.2 | 96.5 | | Valorant | 110.5 | 109.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.9 | 61.4 | | Apex Legends | 103.9 | 103.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.9 | 82.2 | | Overwatch | 89.5 | 88.8 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 76.2 | 75.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 55.3 | 54.8 | | Warzone | 86.2 | 85.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 92.8 | 92.1 | | Valheim | 91.7 | 91.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-1340P | 187% |
Core i9-10885H | 75% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-1340P is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10885H as it consumes less power: 28W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-1340P |
Intel Core i9-10885H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 272 | 213 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2000 | 1582 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 655 | 493 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4545 | 3542 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1533 | 1105 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14988 | 10708 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1340P |
Intel Core i9-10885H | | Single-Core | 3593 | 2917 | | Multi-Core | 20983 | 16129 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1340P |
Intel Core i9-10885H | | Single-Core | 1577 | 1017 | | Multi-Core | 9062 | 8304 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-1340P |
Intel Core i9-10885H | | Announcement date | March 27, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 5.3 MHz | | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 12 | 8 | | Threads | 16 | 16 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 9200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 28 W | 45 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 16 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-1340P is 29% better than Core i9-10885H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-1340P has 4 more core than Core i9-10885H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-1340P is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10885H is better: 3
However, it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-1340P and Intel Core i9-10885H before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-1340P Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i9-10885H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
|
|
|
