|
Intel Core i7-13650HX vs Intel Core i3-N305 |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i7-13650HX vs Intel Core i3-N305 tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for rendering, machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like VeraCrypt, PassMark, 7zip, WPrime, Blender, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, RealBench, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, SuperPi, PCMark 10. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-N305 or Intel Core i7-13650HX.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-13650HX | 58% |
Core i3-N305 | 55% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-13650HX is 5% better than Core i3-N305. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-13650HX | 57% |
Core i3-N305 | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 100.8 | 93.1 | Valorant | 114.5 | 105.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.1 | 59.3 | Apex Legends | 107.6 | 99.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.9 | 79.4 | Overwatch | 92.8 | 85.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.0 | 73.0 | DOOM Eternal | 57.3 | 52.9 | Warzone | 89.3 | 82.5 | Assassin's Creed | 96.2 | 88.9 | Valheim | 95.1 | 87.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-13650HX | 103% |
Core i3-N305 | 501% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-N305 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-13650HX since it has less power consumption: 55W vs. 7W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13650HX |
Intel Core i3-N305 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 268 | 225 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2575 | 1627 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 431 | 535 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5693 | 3691 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1459 | 1250 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 16331 | 12158 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13650HX |
Intel Core i3-N305 | Single-Core | 1336 | 2918 | Multi-Core | 27816 | 17887 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13650HX |
Intel Core i3-N305 | Single-Core | 1710 | 1054 | Multi-Core | 12527 | 5026 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-13650HX |
Intel Core i3-N305 | Announcement date | January 13, 2023 | January 26, 2023 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1964 | FCBGA1264 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake-N | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | 4.9 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 1.8 MHz | Cores | 14 | 8 | Threads | 20 | 8 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 55 W | 7 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 3200 MT/s DDR5 4800 MT/s LPDDR5 4800 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 384KB | L2 cache | 8 MB | 2MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13650HX is 50% better than Core i3-N305 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-13650HX has 6 more core than Core i3-N305. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13650HX is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-N305 is better: 7 Although it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i7-13650HX and Intel Core i3-N305 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-13650HX Processor Comparisons • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
Intel Core i3-N305 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 5 5560U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
| |
|