 |
Mali-G72 MP4 at 800 MHz vs Adreno 616 at 500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-01-2021
Detailed compare data of Mali-G72 MP4 @ 800MHz vs Adreno 616 @ 500MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as PassMark, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, PCMark, GFXBench, Neocore, 3DMark, and how good the GPU are in games Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Madout2, GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-G72 MP4 or Adreno 616.
Mali-G72 MP4 @ 800MHz vs Adreno 616 @ 500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G72 MP4 @ 800MHz |
Adreno 616 @ 500MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 500 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 0 | | Shaders | 0 | 256 | | Lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm | | Antutu v10 | 198765 | 190434 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 6320 | | | | | GFloPS | 184 GFloPS | 459.38 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 117 MT/s | 258 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 3.6 GP/s | 6.57 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G72 MP4 @ 800MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Adreno 616 @ 500MHz is better: 7
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
