|
AMD EPYC 9534 vs AMD EPYC 7713P |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 9534 vs AMD EPYC 7713P and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, rendering, video editing, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Handbrake, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, Blender, SuperPi, Furmark, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, Prime95, 3DMark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7713P or AMD EPYC 9534.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9534 | 85% |
EPYC 7713P | 70% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9534 is 17% better than EPYC 7713P. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9534 | 85% |
EPYC 7713P | 62% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 151.1 | 109.6 | Valorant | 171.7 | 124.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 96.1 | 69.8 | Apex Legends | 161.4 | 117.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 128.8 | 93.5 | Overwatch | 139.1 | 100.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 118.5 | 86.0 | DOOM Eternal | 85.8 | 62.3 | Warzone | 133.9 | 97.2 | Assassin's Creed | 144.2 | 104.7 | Valheim | 142.5 | 103.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9534 | 17% |
EPYC 7713P | 18% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7713P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9534 as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 225W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9534 |
AMD EPYC 7713P | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 352 | 206 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 14288 | 8520 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 657 | 395 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 30279 | 19046 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1604 | 1006 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 78728 | 49525 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9534 |
AMD EPYC 7713P | Single-Core | 3375 | 2232 | Multi-Core | 115485 | 68895 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9534 |
AMD EPYC 7713P | Single-Core | 1450 | 1281 | Multi-Core | 61831 | 21224 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9534 |
AMD EPYC 7713P | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | SP3 | Core name | Genoa | Milan | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 3 | Generation | 4 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.675 MHz | Frequency | 2.45 MHz | 2 MHz | Cores | 64 | 64 | Threads | 128 | 128 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 108000 millions | 86000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 225 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | 100-000000799 100-100000799WOF | 100-000000337 100-100000337WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9534 is 18% better than EPYC 7713P in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9534 is better: 30
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713P is better: 1 However, it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9534 and AMD EPYC 7713P before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9534 Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7713P Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|