Processor comparisons 22-07-2021
You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i9-12900K vs AMD EPYC 7713P and understand which is better for games or simple use for streaming, machine learning, rendering, video editing, programming. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like WPrime, Blender, VeraCrypt, PassMark, Handbrake, 7zip, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Furmark, Geekbench 5.2, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, Prime95, AIDA64, UserBenchmark.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valorant
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7713P or Intel Core i9-12900K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-12900K | 81% |
EPYC 7713P | 88% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7713P is 7% better than Core i9-12900K. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-12900K | 72% |
EPYC 7713P | 68% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 127.0 | 120.8 | | Valorant | 144.4 | 137.3 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 80.8 | 76.9 | | Apex Legends | 135.7 | 129.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 108.3 | 103.0 | | Overwatch | 116.9 | 111.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 99.6 | 94.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 72.2 | 68.6 | | Warzone | 112.6 | 107.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 121.3 | 115.3 | | Valheim | 119.8 | 113.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-12900K | 97% |
EPYC 7713P | 18% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900K is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7713P since it has less power consumption: 125W vs. 225W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-12900K |
AMD EPYC 7713P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 489 | 206 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5150 | 8520 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 816 | 395 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11450 | 19046 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2896 | 1006 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 32950 | 49525 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900K |
AMD EPYC 7713P | | Single-Core | 7546 | 2232 | | Multi-Core | 56332 | 68895 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900K |
AMD EPYC 7713P | | Single-Core | 3641 | 1281 | | Multi-Core | 25262 | 21224 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-12900K |
AMD EPYC 7713P | | Announcement date | July 21, 2021 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Desktop | Server | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | SP3 | | Core name | Alder Lake | Milan | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 12 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 3.675 MHz | | Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 64 | | Threads | 24 | 128 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 2950 millions | 86000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 225 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 14 MB | | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | 100-000000337
100-100000337WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900K is 48% better than EPYC 7713P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7713P has 48 more core than Core i9-12900K. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900K is better: 29
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713P is better: 7
Although it should be realized that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i9-12900K and AMD EPYC 7713P before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
• Cinebench r15 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Core i9-13900K Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7763 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7713 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7663 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7643 Vs EPYC 7713P
• Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Core i9-12900KF Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7543 Vs EPYC 7713P
|
