|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs AMD EPYC 7713P |
|
Processor comparisons 09-06-2022 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs AMD EPYC 7713P and understand which is better for games or simple use for programming, machine learning, rendering, video editing, streaming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, 7zip, RealBench, PassMark, Handbrake, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, AIDA64, MATLAB, Furmark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, Prime95, PCMark 10, 3DMark, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15). And how good the processors are in games: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7713P or AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | 82% |
EPYC 7713P | 70% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is 14% better than EPYC 7713P. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | 75% |
EPYC 7713P | 62% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 132.5 | 109.6 | Valorant | 150.5 | 124.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 84.3 | 69.8 | Apex Legends | 141.5 | 117.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 112.9 | 93.5 | Overwatch | 121.9 | 100.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 103.9 | 86.0 | DOOM Eternal | 75.3 | 62.3 | Warzone | 117.4 | 97.2 | Assassin's Creed | 126.4 | 104.7 | Valheim | 124.9 | 103.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | 18% |
EPYC 7713P | 18% |
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
AMD EPYC 7713P | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 257 | 206 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 13822 | 8520 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 567 | 395 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 29345 | 19046 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1472 | 1006 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 87840 | 49525 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
AMD EPYC 7713P | Single-Core | 3223 | 2232 | Multi-Core | 106970 | 68895 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
AMD EPYC 7713P | Single-Core | 1516 | 1281 | Multi-Core | 43596 | 21224 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
AMD EPYC 7713P | Announcement date | March 08, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | sWRX8 | SP3 | Core name | Chagall PRO | Milan | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 3.675 MHz | Frequency | 2.7 MHz | 2 MHz | Cores | 64 | 64 | Threads | 128 | 128 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 22600 millions | 86000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 225 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 4MB | | L2 cache | 32MB | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000444 | 100-000000337 100-100000337WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is 25% better than EPYC 7713P in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is better: 26
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713P is better: 3 Although it should be understood that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and AMD EPYC 7713P before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
AMD EPYC 7713P Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|