Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
AMD EPYC 7702P vs AMD EPYC 9534 gaming benchmark

AMD EPYC 7702P vs AMD EPYC 9534

Processor comparisons   27-03-2023
   For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7702P vs AMD EPYC 9534 and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming, rendering. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Blender, WPrime, Furmark, PCMark 10, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, RealBench, AIDA64, Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, MATLAB, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender.
   Gaming performance of processors in:
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Borderlands 3
  • Last Man Standing
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Valorant
  • Fallout 76
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Halo Infinite
  • Death Stranding
  • Apex Legends
  • Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Overwatch
  • Fortnite
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Valheim

   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9534 or AMD EPYC 7702P.


 
AMD EPYC 7702P
AMD EPYC 9534

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7702P70% EPYC 953485%
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9534 is 17% better than EPYC 7702P. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
EPYC 7702P80% EPYC 953485%
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL).

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite141.7151.1
Valorant161.1171.7
Cyberpunk 207790.296.1
Apex Legends151.4161.4
Call of Duty Warzone120.8128.8
Overwatch130.5139.1
Red Dead Redemption 2111.1118.5
DOOM Eternal80.585.8
Warzone125.6133.9
Assassin's Creed135.3144.2
Valheim133.7142.5
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
EPYC 7702P18% EPYC 953417%
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7702P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9534 as it consumes less power: 200W vs. 280W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

Let's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
AMD EPYC 7702P AMD EPYC 9534
Cinbench 15 Single-core198352
Cinbench 15 Multi-core818214288
Cinbench 20 Single-core370657
Cinbench 20 Multi-core1828230279
Cinbench 23 Single-core9571604
Cinbench 23 Multi-core4755578728

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7702P AMD EPYC 9534
Single-Core21353375
Multi-Core66158115485

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7702P AMD EPYC 9534
Single-Core10861450
Multi-Core5267461831

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!

AMD EPYC 7702P AMD EPYC 9534
Announcement dateApril 01, 2019November 10, 2022
TypeServerServer
SocketSP3SP5
Core nameRomeGenoa
ArchitectureZen 2Zen 4
Generation24
Turbo Frequency3.35 MHz3.7 MHz
Frequency2 MHz2.45 MHz
Cores6464
Threads128128
Bus rate
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm5 nm
Transistors count86000 millions108000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)200 W280 W
Memory typeDDR4DDR5
Max. Memory
Memory Frequency32004800
Memory bandwidth208 GByte/s460.8
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache256MB256MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCNoYes
Part number100-000000047
100-100000047WOF
100-000000799
100-100000799WOF
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9534 is 18% better than EPYC 7702P in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7702P is better: 1
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9534 is better: 30
   Although it should be understood that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7702P and AMD EPYC 9534 before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7702P - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
AMD EPYC 9534 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


AMD EPYC 7702P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+


AMD EPYC 9534 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands