 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H vs AMD EPYC 9534 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-04-2023
If you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H vs AMD EPYC 9534 and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, programming, video editing, rendering, streaming. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as AIDA64, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, PCMark 10, SuperPi, Furmark, 7zip, Handbrake, 3DMark, Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, PassMark, WPrime.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9534 or Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 65% |
EPYC 9534 | 85% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9534 is 23% better than Xeon Platinum 8444H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 67% |
EPYC 9534 | 85% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 119.1 | 151.1 | | Valorant | 135.3 | 171.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 75.8 | 96.1 | | Apex Legends | 127.2 | 161.4 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 101.5 | 128.8 | | Overwatch | 109.6 | 139.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 93.4 | 118.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 67.6 | 85.8 | | Warzone | 105.5 | 133.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 113.6 | 144.2 | | Valheim | 112.3 | 142.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 15% |
EPYC 9534 | 17% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9534 is more energy efficient than the Xeon Platinum 8444H since it has less power consumption: 270W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 9534 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 1096 | 352 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3538 | 14288 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 2432 | 657 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8731 | 30279 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1693 | 1604 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 49703 | 78728 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 9534 | | Single-Core | 15433 | 3375 | | Multi-Core | 50595 | 115485 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 9534 | | Single-Core | 1270 | 1450 | | Multi-Core | 30447 | 61831 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 9534 | | Announcement date | March 19, 2023 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP5 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Genoa | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 2.45 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 64 | | Threads | 32 | 128 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 108000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 270 W | 280 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 45 MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | 100-000000799
100-100000799WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Platinum 8444H is 15% better than EPYC 9534 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9534 has 48 more core than Xeon Platinum 8444H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H is better: 11
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9534 is better: 23
Although it should be understood that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H and AMD EPYC 9534 before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9534 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
