 |
AMD EPYC 9454P vs AMD EPYC 9534 |
|
Processor comparisons 15-03-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 9454P vs AMD EPYC 9534 tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming. Here you can find useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, Furmark, UserBenchmark, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, PassMark, VeraCrypt, WPrime, Blender, Blender, PCMark 10.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9534 or AMD EPYC 9454P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9454P | 73% |
EPYC 9534 | 85% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9534 is 14% better than EPYC 9454P. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9454P | 80% |
EPYC 9534 | 85% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 142.3 | 151.1 | | Valorant | 161.7 | 171.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 90.6 | 96.1 | | Apex Legends | 152.0 | 161.4 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 121.3 | 128.8 | | Overwatch | 131.0 | 139.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 111.6 | 118.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 80.9 | 85.8 | | Warzone | 126.2 | 133.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 135.9 | 144.2 | | Valheim | 134.2 | 142.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9454P | 17% |
EPYC 9534 | 17% |
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9454P |
AMD EPYC 9534 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 213 | 352 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 9744 | 14288 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 421 | 657 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 20676 | 30279 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1073 | 1604 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 53807 | 78728 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9454P |
AMD EPYC 9534 | | Single-Core | 2439 | 3375 | | Multi-Core | 78937 | 115485 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9454P |
AMD EPYC 9534 | | Single-Core | 1540 | 1450 | | Multi-Core | 53258 | 61831 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 9454P |
AMD EPYC 9534 | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP5 | | Core name | Genoa | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2.75 MHz | 2.45 MHz | | Cores | 48 | 64 | | Threads | 96 | 128 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 108000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 290 W | 280 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000873
100-000000873WOF | 100-000000799
100-100000799WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9454P is 10% better than EPYC 9534 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9534 has 16 more core than EPYC 9454P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9454P is better: 5
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9534 is better: 24
However, it should be understood that all the data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 9454P and AMD EPYC 9534 before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9454P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9534 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
