|
Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ vs AMD EPYC 7713P |
|
Processor comparisons 15-05-2023 For example you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ vs AMD EPYC 7713P and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, video editing, programming, rendering. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as Blender, RealBench, Prime95, Furmark, 7zip, MATLAB, Handbrake, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, AIDA64, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7713P or Intel Xeon Silver 4416+.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon Silver 4416+ | 64% |
EPYC 7713P | 70% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7713P is 8% better than Xeon Silver 4416+. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon Silver 4416+ | 67% |
EPYC 7713P | 62% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, NBA 2K20, Control, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 118.0 | 109.6 | Valorant | 134.1 | 124.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 75.1 | 69.8 | Apex Legends | 126.1 | 117.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 100.6 | 93.5 | Overwatch | 108.6 | 100.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 92.6 | 86.0 | DOOM Eternal | 67.1 | 62.3 | Warzone | 104.6 | 97.2 | Assassin's Creed | 112.7 | 104.7 | Valheim | 111.3 | 103.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon Silver 4416+ | 24% |
EPYC 7713P | 18% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Silver 4416+ is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7713P since it has less power consumption: 165W vs. 225W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
AMD EPYC 7713P | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 1057 | 206 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3419 | 8520 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 2350 | 395 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8442 | 19046 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1634 | 1006 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 48070 | 49525 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
AMD EPYC 7713P | Single-Core | 14924 | 2232 | Multi-Core | 48932 | 68895 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
AMD EPYC 7713P | Single-Core | 1225 | 1281 | Multi-Core | 29446 | 21224 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
AMD EPYC 7713P | Announcement date | March 28, 2023 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Milan | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | Generation | 4 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 3.675 MHz | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2 MHz | Cores | 20 | 64 | Threads | 40 | 128 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 86000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 165 W | 225 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 37.5 MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | 100-000000337 100-100000337WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that EPYC 7713P has 44 more core than Xeon Silver 4416+. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ is better: 24
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713P is better: 10 However, it should be understood that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ and AMD EPYC 7713P before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 74F3
AMD EPYC 7713P Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
| |
|