Processor comparisons 10-01-2022
Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i9-12900E vs AMD EPYC 7713P and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, programming, video editing, streaming. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Gears 5, AIDA64, 7zip, 3DMark, PassMark, VeraCrypt, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, Blender, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, Geekbench 5.2, Blender, WPrime, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valheim
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7713P or Intel Core i9-12900E.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-12900E | 73% |
EPYC 7713P | 82% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7713P is 10% better than Core i9-12900E. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-12900E | 63% |
EPYC 7713P | 68% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 112.3 | 120.8 | | Valorant | 127.6 | 137.3 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 71.4 | 76.9 | | Apex Legends | 119.9 | 129.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 95.7 | 103.0 | | Overwatch | 103.3 | 111.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.0 | 94.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 63.8 | 68.6 | | Warzone | 99.5 | 107.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 107.2 | 115.3 | | Valheim | 105.9 | 113.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-12900E | 94% |
EPYC 7713P | 18% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900E is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7713P since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 225W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-12900E |
AMD EPYC 7713P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 436 | 206 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4593 | 8520 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 728 | 395 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10212 | 19046 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2582 | 1006 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 29385 | 49525 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900E |
AMD EPYC 7713P | | Single-Core | 6730 | 2232 | | Multi-Core | 50237 | 68895 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900E |
AMD EPYC 7713P | | Single-Core | 1847 | 1281 | | Multi-Core | 15707 | 21224 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-12900E |
AMD EPYC 7713P | | Announcement date | July 21, 2021 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Embedded | Server | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | SP3 | | Core name | Alder Lake | Milan | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 12 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 5 MHz | 3.675 MHz | | Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 64 | | Threads | 24 | 128 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 12600 millions | 86000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 225 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 12 MB | | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | 100-000000337
100-100000337WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900E is 47% better than EPYC 7713P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7713P has 48 more core than Core i9-12900E. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900E is better: 17
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713P is better: 19
Although it should be realized that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i9-12900E and AMD EPYC 7713P before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7713P
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7763 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7713 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7663 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7713P
• Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7643 Vs EPYC 7713P
• Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
|
