 |
AMD EPYC 9534 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6242R |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 9534 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6242R tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, streaming, video editing, programming, rendering. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, Gears 5, SuperPi, MATLAB, PassMark, 7zip, Furmark, VeraCrypt, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, Blender, AIDA64, 3DMark, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 6242R or AMD EPYC 9534.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9534 | 85% |
Xeon Gold 6242R | 60% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9534 is 29% better than Xeon Gold 6242R. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9534 | 85% |
Xeon Gold 6242R | 66% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Control.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 151.1 | 117.7 | Valorant | 171.7 | 133.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 96.1 | 74.9 | Apex Legends | 161.4 | 125.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 128.8 | 100.4 | Overwatch | 139.1 | 108.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 118.5 | 92.3 | DOOM Eternal | 85.8 | 66.9 | Warzone | 133.9 | 104.4 | Assassin's Creed | 144.2 | 112.4 | Valheim | 142.5 | 111.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9534 | 17% |
Xeon Gold 6242R | 17% |
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9534 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6242R | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 352 | 216 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 14288 | 5946 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 657 | 497 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 30279 | 14382 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1604 | 1269 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 78728 | 36754 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9534 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6242R | Single-Core | 3375 | 2419 | Multi-Core | 115485 | 34882 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9534 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6242R | Single-Core | 1450 | 1073 | Multi-Core | 61831 | 29161 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9534 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6242R | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | FCLGA3647 | Core name | Genoa | Cascade Lake | Architecture | Zen 4 | x86 | Generation | 4 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 2.45 MHz | 3.1 MHz | Cores | 64 | 20 | Threads | 128 | 40 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 108000 millions | 7510 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 205 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 35.75 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | 100-000000799 100-100000799WOF | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6242R is 20% better than EPYC 9534 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9534 has 44 more core than Xeon Gold 6242R. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9534 is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6242R is better: 6 However, it should be understood that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9534 and Intel Xeon Gold 6242R before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9534 Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon Gold 6242R Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|