Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
AMD EPYC 7713P vs AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 gaming benchmark

AMD EPYC 7713P vs AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900

Processor comparisons   25-03-2021
   For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7713P vs AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, programming, machine learning, rendering, video editing. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, VeraCrypt, Furmark, Geekbench 5.2, RealBench, Blender, AIDA64, WPrime, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, 7zip, Prime95, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, SuperPi, Blender, MATLAB.
   Gaming performance of processors in:
  • Overwatch
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Last Man Standing
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Fortnite
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
  • Death Stranding
  • Borderlands 3
  • Apex Legends
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Valheim
  • Halo Infinite
  • Valorant
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Fallout 76

   After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 or AMD EPYC 7713P.

 
AMD EPYC 7713P
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors

Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7713P88% Ryzen 9 PRO 390067%
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7713P is 23% better than Ryzen 9 PRO 3900. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
EPYC 7713P68% Ryzen 9 PRO 390060%
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite120.8105.8
Valorant137.3120.2
Cyberpunk 207776.967.3
Apex Legends129.0113.0
Call of Duty Warzone103.090.1
Overwatch111.297.4
Red Dead Redemption 294.782.9
DOOM Eternal68.660.1
Warzone107.193.7
Assassin's Creed115.3101.0
Valheim113.999.8
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
EPYC 7713P18% Ryzen 9 PRO 390064%
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7713P since it has less power consumption: 225W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.


Software benchmarks

If you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
AMD EPYC 7713P AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Cinbench 15 Single-core206202
Cinbench 15 Multi-core85203007
Cinbench 20 Single-core395499
Cinbench 20 Multi-core190466987
Cinbench 23 Single-core10061182
Cinbench 23 Multi-core4952517436

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7713P AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Single-Core22322663
Multi-Core6889531704

GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7713P AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Single-Core12811252
Multi-Core2122411494

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

AMD EPYC 7713P AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Announcement dateMarch 15, 2021September 30, 2019
TypeServerDesktop
SocketSP3AM4
Core nameMilanMatisse
ArchitectureZen 3Zen 2
Generation32
Turbo Frequency3.675 MHz4.3 MHz
Frequency2 MHz3.1 MHz
Cores6412
Threads12824
Bus rate
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm
Transistors count86000 millions7800 millions
Power consumption (TDP)225 W65 W
Memory typeDDR4DDR4
Max. Memory
Memory Frequency32003200
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s
L1 cache768KB
L2 cache6MB
L3 cache256MB64MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCNoNo
Part number100-000000337
100-100000337WOF
100-000000072
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is 35% better than EPYC 7713P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7713P has 52 more core than Ryzen 9 PRO 3900. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713P is better: 25
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is better: 9
   Although it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7713P and AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 5 score


Versus Battle of the Processors
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7763 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7713 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7663 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7713P
• Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7643 Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• EPYC 7543 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7513 Vs EPYC 7713P

• Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark
•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 5 score
• Fortnite gaming benchmark
• Roblox gaming benchmark
• Valorant gaming benchmark
• Apex Legends gaming benchmark
• Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark
• Overwatch gaming benchmark
• Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark
• DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark
• Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark
• GTA 5 gaming benchmark
• PUBG gaming benchmark


Versus Battle of the Processors
• Core i9-13900K Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• EPYC 75F3 Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• EPYC 7713 Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• EPYC 7742 Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• EPYC 7663 Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• EPYC 7543P Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• EPYC 7643 Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• EPYC 7543 Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• EPYC 7513 Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• EPYC 7502 Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Categories
 • Comparisons
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 5
 • Antutu 8
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands
Last added

Core i9-13900K vs Core i9-11900..
Core i9-13900K vs Core i9-11900K..
Mali-G78AE(700MHz) vs Mali-G78 M..
Mali-G310 MP6(800MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G510 MP6 (800 MHz) GPU Benchma..
Mali-G510 MP6(800MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G610 MP6(600MHz) vs Apple A..
Mali-G310 MP6(800MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G710 MP16(650MHz) vs Apple ..
Core i9-13900K vs Core i9-11980H..
Core i9-13900K vs Ryzen 7 5700G..
Mali-G310 MP6(800MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G310 MP6(800MHz) vs PowerVR..
Mali-G310 MP6(800MHz) vs Mali-T8..
Mali-G310 MP6(800MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G78AE(700MHz) vs Apple A14 ..
Mali-G710 MP16(650MHz) vs Mali-G..
Mali-G310 MP6(800MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G510 MP6(800MHz) vs Mali-G5..
Mali-G310 MP6(800MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G710 MP16 (650 MHz) GPU Benchm..
Core i9-13900K vs Ryzen 7 Pro 57..
Mali-G78AE(700MHz) vs Adreno 619..
Mali-G310 MP6(800MHz) vs Mali-T6..
Mali-G610 MP6(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G510 MP6(800MHz) vs Mali-G6..
Core i9-13900K vs Ryzen 9 3900XT..
Mali-G510 MP6(800MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G510 MP6(800MHz) vs Apple A..
Mali-G610 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU PUBG mo..
Mali-G510 MP6(800MHz) vs Apple A..
Mali-G610 MP6(600MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G610 MP6(600MHz) vs Mali-G5..
Mali-G510 MP6(800MHz) vs Apple A..
Mali-G310 MP6(800MHz) vs Intel H..
Mali-G710 MP16 (650 MHz) GPU SoCs l..
Mali-G78AE(700MHz) vs Mali-G57 M..
Mali-G510 MP6(800MHz) vs Mali-G5..
Mali-G710 MP16(650MHz) vs Mali-G..
Mali-G310 MP6(800MHz) vs Adreno ..