Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
AMD EPYC 7713P vs Intel Xeon W-3175X gaming benchmark

AMD EPYC 7713P vs Intel Xeon W-3175X

Processor comparisons   25-03-2021
   Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7713P vs Intel Xeon W-3175X and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, video editing, rendering, programming, streaming. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, RealBench, Blender, Blender, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, Furmark, Gears 5, Handbrake, Geekbench 5.2, PCMark 10, PassMark, 3DMark.
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:
  • Apex Legends
  • Fallout 76
  • Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
  • Overwatch
  • Borderlands 3
  • Halo Infinite
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Valorant
  • Last Man Standing
  • Death Stranding
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Fortnite
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Valheim

   After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-3175X or AMD EPYC 7713P.

 
AMD EPYC 7713P
Intel Xeon W-3175X

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors

Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7713P88% Xeon W-3175X67%
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7713P is 23% better than Xeon W-3175X. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
EPYC 7713P68% Xeon W-3175X74%
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite120.8130.6
Valorant137.3148.4
Cyberpunk 207776.983.1
Apex Legends129.0139.5
Call of Duty Warzone103.0111.3
Overwatch111.2120.2
Red Dead Redemption 294.7102.4
DOOM Eternal68.674.2
Warzone107.1115.7
Assassin's Creed115.3124.6
Valheim113.9123.2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
EPYC 7713P18% Xeon W-3175X17%
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7713P is more energy efficient than the Xeon W-3175X since it has less power consumption: 225W vs. 255W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.


Software benchmarks

For example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
AMD EPYC 7713P Intel Xeon W-3175X
Cinbench 15 Single-core206188
Cinbench 15 Multi-core85205514
Cinbench 20 Single-core395417
Cinbench 20 Multi-core1904612975
Cinbench 23 Single-core10061112
Cinbench 23 Multi-core4952531350

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7713P Intel Xeon W-3175X
Single-Core22322147
Multi-Core6889531909

GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7713P Intel Xeon W-3175X
Single-Core12811351
Multi-Core2122427550

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!

AMD EPYC 7713P Intel Xeon W-3175X
Announcement dateMarch 15, 2021January 01, 2019
TypeServerDesktop
SocketSP3FCLGA3647
Core nameMilanSkylake
ArchitectureZen 3x86
Generation32
Turbo Frequency3.675 MHz3.8 MHz
Frequency2 MHz3.1 MHz
Cores6428
Threads12856
Bus rate8 GT/s
Bit6464
Lithography14 nm
Transistors count86000 millions7510 millions
Power consumption (TDP)225 W255 W
Memory typeDDR4DDR4-2666
Max. Memory512 Gb
Memory Frequency3200
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache256MB38.5 MB
OverclockingNoYes
Supports ECCNoYes
Part number100-000000337
100-100000337WOF
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon W-3175X is 35% better than EPYC 7713P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7713P has 36 more core than Xeon W-3175X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713P is better: 15
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-3175X is better: 22
   Although it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7713P and Intel Xeon W-3175X before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 5 score


Versus Battle of the Processors
• EPYC 7763 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7713 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7663 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7643 Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• EPYC 7543 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7513 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 74F3 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7443P Vs EPYC 7713P

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 5 score
• Fortnite gaming benchmark
• Roblox gaming benchmark
• Valorant gaming benchmark
• Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark
• Apex Legends gaming benchmark
• Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark
• Overwatch gaming benchmark
• Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark
• DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark
• Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark
• GTA 5 gaming benchmark
• PUBG gaming benchmark


Versus Battle of the Processors
• EPYC 7763 Vs Xeon W-3175X
• EPYC 75F3 Vs Xeon W-3175X
• EPYC 7713 Vs Xeon W-3175X
• EPYC 7742 Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• EPYC 7663 Vs Xeon W-3175X
• EPYC 7543P Vs Xeon W-3175X
• EPYC 7643 Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• EPYC 7543 Vs Xeon W-3175X
• EPYC 7513 Vs Xeon W-3175X
Categories
 • Comparisons
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 5
 • Antutu 8
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands
Last added

Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 7 5800X..
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen Threadri..
Core i9-11950H vs Core i9-9940X..
Core i9-11900H vs Core i7-11700K..
Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 PRO 47..
Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 5 5600H..
Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 Extrem..
Core i9-10900TE vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4..
Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 9 5980HS..
Core i9-11900KB vs Core i9-11900..
Core i9-11980HK vs Core i9-7980X..
Intel Core i9-11900KB Cinebench r23
Core i9-11950H vs Xeon Gold 6248..
Intel Core i9-10900E Cinebench r15
Core i9-10900E vs Core i5-11500T..
Core i9-11980HK vs Ryzen 9 5900..
Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen Threadri..
Core i9-11900KB vs Core i9-11900..
Intel Core i9-11950H GeekBench 5
Core i9-11980HK vs Core i7-11700..
Core i9-10900E vs Core i7-9800X..
Core i9-10900TE vs Xeon E5-2697R..
Core i9-11900KB vs Xeon W-2275..
Intel Core i9-11900KB GeekBench 5
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen Threadri..
Intel Core i9-10900E GeekBench 5
Core i9-11950H vs Core i9-11900F..
Intel Core i9-11900H Cinebench r20
Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 2700..
Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 7 5700G..
Core i9-11900H vs Core i9-11900F..
Core i9-11900KB vs Core i9-10920..
Core i9-11900KB vs Core i9-10980..
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen 7 5800X..
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen Threadri..
Core i9-10900TE vs Core i7-10700..
Core i9-10900TE vs Ryzen 5 4600H..
Core i9-10900E vs Core i9-10885H..
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen 7 Pro 58..
Core i9-10900TE vs Core i9-10885..