Processor comparisons 25-03-2021
Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 7443P vs AMD EPYC 7713P and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing, rendering. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Blender, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, 7zip, Handbrake, 3DMark, Prime95, MATLAB, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Geekbench 5.2, WPrime, Blender, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, Furmark, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), AIDA64, RealBench.
And how good the processors are in games: - Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7713P or AMD EPYC 7443P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7443P | 77% |
EPYC 7713P | 88% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7713P is 12% better than EPYC 7443P. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7443P | 72% |
EPYC 7713P | 68% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 126.8 | 120.8 | | Valorant | 144.1 | 137.3 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 80.7 | 76.9 | | Apex Legends | 135.4 | 129.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 108.1 | 103.0 | | Overwatch | 116.7 | 111.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 99.4 | 94.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 72.0 | 68.6 | | Warzone | 112.4 | 107.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 121.0 | 115.3 | | Valheim | 119.6 | 113.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7443P | 22% |
EPYC 7713P | 18% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7443P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7713P since it has less power consumption: 200W vs. 225W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7443P |
AMD EPYC 7713P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 148 | 206 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6136 | 8520 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 279 | 395 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 13006 | 19046 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 687 | 1006 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 33819 | 49525 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7443P |
AMD EPYC 7713P | | Single-Core | 1545 | 2232 | | Multi-Core | 49608 | 68895 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7443P |
AMD EPYC 7713P | | Single-Core | 1368 | 1281 | | Multi-Core | 25103 | 21224 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7443P |
AMD EPYC 7713P | | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Milan | Milan | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 3 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.675 MHz | | Frequency | 2.85 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 64 | | Threads | 48 | 128 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 62000 millions | 86000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 225 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000342
100-100000342WOF
| 100-000000337
100-100000337WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7443P is 29% better than EPYC 7713P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7713P has 40 more core than EPYC 7443P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7443P is better: 16
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713P is better: 12
However, it should be realized that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7443P and AMD EPYC 7713P before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7763 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7713 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7663 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7713P
• Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7643 Vs EPYC 7713P
• Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Core i9-12900KF Vs EPYC 7713P
|
