Processor comparisons 25-03-2021
For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7443 vs AMD EPYC 7713P and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like MATLAB, Blender, RealBench, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, Furmark, PCMark 10, WPrime, Geekbench 5.2, Gears 5, AIDA64, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, 7zip, 3DMark.
And how good the processors are in games: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7713P or AMD EPYC 7443.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7443 | 77% |
EPYC 7713P | 88% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7713P is 12% better than EPYC 7443. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7443 | 71% |
EPYC 7713P | 68% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 126.4 | 120.8 | | Valorant | 143.6 | 137.3 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 80.4 | 76.9 | | Apex Legends | 135.0 | 129.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 107.7 | 103.0 | | Overwatch | 116.4 | 111.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 99.1 | 94.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 71.8 | 68.6 | | Warzone | 112.0 | 107.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 120.7 | 115.3 | | Valheim | 119.2 | 113.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7443 | 22% |
EPYC 7713P | 18% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7443 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7713P as it consumes less power: 200W vs. 225W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7443 |
AMD EPYC 7713P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 147 | 206 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6075 | 8520 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 276 | 395 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 12876 | 19046 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 680 | 1006 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 33481 | 49525 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7443 |
AMD EPYC 7713P | | Single-Core | 1530 | 2232 | | Multi-Core | 49112 | 68895 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7443 |
AMD EPYC 7713P | | Single-Core | 1354 | 1281 | | Multi-Core | 24852 | 21224 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7443 |
AMD EPYC 7713P | | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Milan | Milan | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 3 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.675 MHz | | Frequency | 2.85 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 64 | | Threads | 48 | 128 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | | | Transistors count | 62000 millions | 86000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 225 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000342
100-100000342WOF
| 100-000000337
100-100000337WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7443 is 29% better than EPYC 7713P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7713P has 40 more core than EPYC 7443. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7443 is better: 16
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713P is better: 13
Although it should be understood that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7443 and AMD EPYC 7713P before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• EPYC 7763 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7713 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7663 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7643 Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• EPYC 7543 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7513 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 74F3 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7443P Vs EPYC 7713P
|
