 |
AMD EPYC 9534 vs Intel Xeon W-3275M |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023
Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 9534 vs Intel Xeon W-3275M tests and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming, video editing. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, AIDA64, Blender, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, Blender, 7zip, Gears 5, Furmark, Prime95, WPrime, PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, RealBench, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark.
And how good the processors are in games: - Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-3275M or AMD EPYC 9534.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9534 | 85% |
Xeon W-3275M | 61% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9534 is 28% better than Xeon W-3275M. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9534 | 85% |
Xeon W-3275M | 62% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 151.1 | 109.5 | | Valorant | 171.7 | 124.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 96.1 | 69.7 | | Apex Legends | 161.4 | 117.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 128.8 | 93.3 | | Overwatch | 139.1 | 100.8 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 118.5 | 85.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 85.8 | 62.2 | | Warzone | 133.9 | 97.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 144.2 | 104.5 | | Valheim | 142.5 | 103.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9534 | 17% |
Xeon W-3275M | 19% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon W-3275M is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9534 as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 205W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9534 |
Intel Xeon W-3275M | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 352 | 232 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 14288 | 6801 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 657 | 437 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 30279 | 11020 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1604 | 1107 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 78728 | 28051 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9534 |
Intel Xeon W-3275M | | Single-Core | 3375 | 2721 | | Multi-Core | 115485 | 39359 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9534 |
Intel Xeon W-3275M | | Single-Core | 1450 | 1199 | | Multi-Core | 61831 | 21098 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9534 |
Intel Xeon W-3275M | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | January 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | FCLGA3647 | | Core name | Genoa | Cascade Lake | | Architecture | Zen 4 | x86 | | Generation | 4 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 2.45 MHz | 2.5 MHz | | Cores | 64 | 28 | | Threads | 128 | 56 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 108000 millions | 7510 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 205 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | | 2 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 38.5 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000799
100-100000799WOF | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon W-3275M is 1% better than EPYC 9534 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9534 has 36 more core than Xeon W-3275M. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9534 is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-3275M is better: 6
However, it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9534 and Intel Xeon W-3275M before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9534 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon W-3275M Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs Core i7-12700E
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-12700HL
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i7-12800HL
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
