 |
AMD EPYC 9534 vs AMD EPYC 7F72 |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023
For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 9534 vs AMD EPYC 7F72 and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering, video editing. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like UserBenchmark, Blender, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, Gears 5, RealBench, Prime95, 7zip, AIDA64, PCMark 10.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Halo Infinite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7F72 or AMD EPYC 9534.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9534 | 85% |
EPYC 7F72 | 67% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9534 is 21% better than EPYC 7F72. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9534 | 85% |
EPYC 7F72 | 71% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 151.1 | 126.7 | | Valorant | 171.7 | 143.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 96.1 | 80.6 | | Apex Legends | 161.4 | 135.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 128.8 | 107.9 | | Overwatch | 139.1 | 116.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 118.5 | 99.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 85.8 | 72.0 | | Warzone | 133.9 | 112.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 144.2 | 120.9 | | Valheim | 142.5 | 119.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9534 | 17% |
EPYC 7F72 | 16% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9534 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7F72 since it has less power consumption: 280W vs. 240W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9534 |
AMD EPYC 7F72 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 352 | 172 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 14288 | 6991 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 657 | 322 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 30279 | 14814 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1604 | 786 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 78728 | 38516 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9534 |
AMD EPYC 7F72 | | Single-Core | 3375 | 1763 | | Multi-Core | 115485 | 56496 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9534 |
AMD EPYC 7F72 | | Single-Core | 1450 | 1159 | | Multi-Core | 61831 | 37901 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 9534 |
AMD EPYC 7F72 | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | April 14, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP3 | | Core name | Genoa | Rome | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 4 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2.45 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Cores | 64 | 24 | | Threads | 128 | 48 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 108000 millions | 62000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 240 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 192MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000799
100-100000799WOF | 100-000000141
100-000000141WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7F72 is 23% better than EPYC 9534 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9534 has 40 more core than EPYC 7F72. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9534 is better: 31
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7F72 is better: 3
However, it should be realized that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 9534 and AMD EPYC 7F72 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9534 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7F72 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
