|
AMD EPYC 9534 vs Intel Xeon W-1290T |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 9534 vs Intel Xeon W-1290T tests and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, rendering, machine learning, programming, streaming. Here you can find useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Prime95, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, Gears 5, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, Blender, Handbrake, PCMark 10, 3DMark, Furmark, 7zip, UserBenchmark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-1290T or AMD EPYC 9534.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9534 | 85% |
Xeon W-1290T | 55% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9534 is 35% better than Xeon W-1290T. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9534 | 85% |
Xeon W-1290T | 54% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 151.1 | 96.5 | Valorant | 171.7 | 109.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 96.1 | 61.4 | Apex Legends | 161.4 | 103.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 128.8 | 82.2 | Overwatch | 139.1 | 88.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 118.5 | 75.7 | DOOM Eternal | 85.8 | 54.8 | Warzone | 133.9 | 85.5 | Assassin's Creed | 144.2 | 92.1 | Valheim | 142.5 | 91.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9534 | 17% |
Xeon W-1290T | 124% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon W-1290T is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9534 since it has less power consumption: 280W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9534 |
Intel Xeon W-1290T | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 352 | 108 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 14288 | 3171 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 657 | 240 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 30279 | 7463 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1604 | 640 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 78728 | 18031 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9534 |
Intel Xeon W-1290T | Single-Core | 3375 | 2944 | Multi-Core | 115485 | 18353 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9534 |
Intel Xeon W-1290T | Single-Core | 1450 | 1308 | Multi-Core | 61831 | 8329 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 9534 |
Intel Xeon W-1290T | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | January 01, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Genoa | Comet Lake | Architecture | Zen 4 | x86 | Generation | 4 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 4.7 MHz | Frequency | 2.45 MHz | 1.9 MHz | Cores | 64 | 10 | Threads | 128 | 20 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 108000 millions | 2460 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 35 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 20 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | 100-000000799 100-100000799WOF | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9534 is 22% better than Xeon W-1290T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9534 has 54 more core than Xeon W-1290T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9534 is better: 30
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-1290T is better: 6 However, it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9534 and Intel Xeon W-1290T before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9534 Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon W-1290T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|