 |
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T vs AMD EPYC 9534 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
If there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Xeon Silver 4410T vs AMD EPYC 9534 and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing, rendering. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Blender, RealBench, PCMark 10, Prime95, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, PassMark, MATLAB, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, Furmark, WPrime.
And how good the processors are in games: - Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9534 or Intel Xeon Silver 4410T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Silver 4410T | 57% |
EPYC 9534 | 85% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9534 is 32% better than Xeon Silver 4410T. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Silver 4410T | 64% |
EPYC 9534 | 85% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Control, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 113.2 | 151.1 | | Valorant | 128.6 | 171.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.0 | 96.1 | | Apex Legends | 120.9 | 161.4 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 128.8 | | Overwatch | 104.2 | 139.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.7 | 118.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 64.3 | 85.8 | | Warzone | 100.3 | 133.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 108.0 | 144.2 | | Valheim | 106.7 | 142.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Silver 4410T | 29% |
EPYC 9534 | 17% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Silver 4410T is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9534 as it consumes less power: 150W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
AMD EPYC 9534 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 509 | 352 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2388 | 14288 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1223 | 657 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5323 | 30279 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 3011 | 1604 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 13359 | 78728 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
AMD EPYC 9534 | | Single-Core | 388 | 3375 | | Multi-Core | 26159 | 115485 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
AMD EPYC 9534 | | Single-Core | 1323 | 1450 | | Multi-Core | 24668 | 61831 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
AMD EPYC 9534 | | Announcement date | March 14, 2023 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP5 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Genoa | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2.7 MHz | 2.45 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 64 | | Threads | 20 | 128 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 108000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 280 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 26.25 MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | 100-000000799
100-100000799WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Silver 4410T is 9% better than EPYC 9534 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9534 has 54 more core than Xeon Silver 4410T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Silver 4410T is better: 10
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9534 is better: 24
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Xeon Silver 4410T and AMD EPYC 9534 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9534 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
