|
AMD EPYC 7713P vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|
Processor comparisons 25-03-2021 For example you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 7713P vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, rendering, video editing, programming, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, Furmark, Blender, UserBenchmark, PassMark, PCMark 10, AIDA64, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, Blender, RealBench, MATLAB. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X or AMD EPYC 7713P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7713P | 70% |
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | 66% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7713P is 5% better than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7713P | 62% |
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | 64% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 109.6 | 113.6 | Valorant | 124.6 | 129.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 69.8 | 72.3 | Apex Legends | 117.1 | 121.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 93.5 | 96.8 | Overwatch | 100.9 | 104.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 86.0 | 89.1 | DOOM Eternal | 62.3 | 64.5 | Warzone | 97.2 | 100.7 | Assassin's Creed | 104.7 | 108.4 | Valheim | 103.4 | 107.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7713P | 18% |
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | 15% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7713P is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X as it consumes less power: 225W vs. 280W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7713P |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 206 | 209 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8520 | 5933 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 395 | 509 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 19046 | 13552 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1006 | 1270 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 49525 | 34255 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7713P |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Single-Core | 2232 | 2663 | Multi-Core | 68895 | 54830 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7713P |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Single-Core | 1281 | 1306 | Multi-Core | 21224 | 25072 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7713P |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | November 25, 2019 | Type | Server | Desktop | Socket | SP3 | sTRX4 | Core name | Milan | Castle Peak | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 2 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.675 MHz | 4.5 MHz | Frequency | 2 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Cores | 64 | 24 | Threads | 128 | 48 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 22600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 280 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 1.5MB | L2 cache | | 12MB | L3 cache | 256MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000337 100-100000337WOF
| 100-000000010 100-100000010WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 47% better than EPYC 7713P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7713P has 40 more core than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713P is better: 11
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is better: 22 However, it should be realized that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7713P and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7713P Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
| |
|