AMD EPYC 7713P vs Intel Xeon D-1602

Processor comparisons 27-03-2023

   If there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 7713P vs Intel Xeon D-1602 and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, streaming, rendering, machine learning. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, Blender, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, 7zip, RealBench, AIDA64, 3DMark, PCMark 10, Prime95, Blender, SuperPi, UserBenchmark.
   Gaming performance of processors in:

DOOM: Eternal
Red Dead Redemption 2
Death Stranding
Cyberpunk 2077
Rainbow Six Siege
Fortnite
Halo Infinite
Apex Legends
Overwatch
Fallout 76
Valheim
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Valorant
Last Man Standing
Borderlands 3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
Watch Dogs Legion
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Grand Theft Auto V

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon D-1602 or AMD EPYC 7713P.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

EPYC 7713P

70%

Xeon D-1602

50%

The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7713P is 28% better than Xeon D-1602. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

EPYC 7713P

62%

Xeon D-1602

50%

For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Control, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	109.6	88.9
Valorant	124.6	101.0
Cyberpunk 2077	69.8	56.5
Apex Legends	117.1	94.9
Call of Duty Warzone	93.5	75.7
Overwatch	100.9	81.8
Red Dead Redemption 2	86.0	69.7
DOOM Eternal	62.3	50.5
Warzone	97.2	78.8
Assassin's Creed	104.7	84.8
Valheim	103.4	83.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

EPYC 7713P

18%

Xeon D-1602

32%

To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon D-1602 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7713P since it has less power consumption: 225W vs. 27W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

Let's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.

Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	AMD EPYC 7713P	Intel Xeon D-1602
Cinbench 15 Single-core	206	60
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	8520	215
Cinbench 20 Single-core	395	134
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	19046	435
Cinbench 23 Single-core	1006	333
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	49525	1219

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 7713P	Intel Xeon D-1602
Single-Core	2232	1420
Multi-Core	68895	2466

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 7713P	Intel Xeon D-1602
Single-Core	1281	264
Multi-Core	21224	846

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

	AMD EPYC 7713P	Intel Xeon D-1602
Announcement date	March 15, 2021	October 01, 2020
Type	Server	Server
Socket	SP3	FCBGA1667
Core name	Milan	Hewitt Lake
Architecture	Zen 3	x86
Generation	3	3
Turbo Frequency	3.675 MHz	3.2 MHz
Frequency	2 MHz	2.5 MHz
Cores	64	2
Threads	128	4
Bus rate
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	14 nm
Transistors count	86000 millions	2460 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	225 W	27 W
Memory type	DDR4	DDR4, DDR3
Max. Memory		128 Gb
Memory Frequency	3200
Memory bandwidth	204.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache	256MB	3 MB
Overclocking	No	yes
Supports ECC	No	Yes
Part number	100-000000337 100-100000337WOF

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon D-1602 is 19% better than EPYC 7713P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7713P has 62 more core than Xeon D-1602. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713P is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon D-1602 is better: 5
However, it should be realized that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7713P and Intel Xeon D-1602 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.

AMD EPYC 7713P - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD EPYC 7713P specs and review.

Intel Xeon D-1602 - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• Intel Xeon D-1602 specs and review.