|
AMD EPYC 9534 vs AMD EPYC 7502 |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023 If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 9534 vs AMD EPYC 7502 tests and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like UserBenchmark, 3DMark, Prime95, VeraCrypt, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, MATLAB, AIDA64, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, PassMark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7502 or AMD EPYC 9534.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9534 | 85% |
EPYC 7502 | 66% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9534 is 22% better than EPYC 7502. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9534 | 85% |
EPYC 7502 | 73% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 151.1 | 129.9 | Valorant | 171.7 | 147.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 96.1 | 82.7 | Apex Legends | 161.4 | 138.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 128.8 | 110.7 | Overwatch | 139.1 | 119.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 118.5 | 101.9 | DOOM Eternal | 85.8 | 73.8 | Warzone | 133.9 | 115.2 | Assassin's Creed | 144.2 | 124.0 | Valheim | 142.5 | 122.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9534 | 17% |
EPYC 7502 | 17% |
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9534 |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 352 | 160 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 14288 | 6608 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 657 | 391 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 30279 | 14007 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1604 | 740 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 78728 | 36424 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9534 |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Single-Core | 3375 | 2094 | Multi-Core | 115485 | 53430 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9534 |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Single-Core | 1450 | 939 | Multi-Core | 61831 | 41117 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 9534 |
AMD EPYC 7502 | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | SP3 | Core name | Genoa | Rome | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 2 | Generation | 4 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Frequency | 2.45 MHz | 2.5 MHz | Cores | 64 | 32 | Threads | 128 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 108000 millions | 64000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 180 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | 100-000000799 100-100000799WOF | 100-000000054 100-100000054WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7502 is 1% better than EPYC 9534 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9534 has 32 more core than EPYC 7502. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9534 is better: 32
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7502 is better: 3 However, it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9534 and AMD EPYC 7502 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9534 Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7502 Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|