Processor comparisons 09-06-2022
Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs AMD EPYC 7543 tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming, rendering. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like PassMark, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, Blender, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, 3DMark, Geekbench 5.2, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, SuperPi, Blender, Prime95, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, 7zip.
And how good the processors are in games: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7543 or AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | 99% |
EPYC 7543 | 75% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is 24% better than EPYC 7543. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | 88% |
EPYC 7543 | 76% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, Control, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 155.4 | 134.8 | | Valorant | 176.6 | 153.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 98.9 | 85.8 | | Apex Legends | 166.0 | 144.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 132.4 | 114.9 | | Overwatch | 143.0 | 124.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 121.8 | 105.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 88.3 | 76.6 | | Warzone | 137.7 | 119.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 148.3 | 128.7 | | Valheim | 146.5 | 127.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | 18% |
EPYC 7543 | 20% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7543 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 225W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
AMD EPYC 7543 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 257 | 164 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 13822 | 6747 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 567 | 307 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 29345 | 14301 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1472 | 756 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 87840 | 37190 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
AMD EPYC 7543 | | Single-Core | 3223 | 1592 | | Multi-Core | 106970 | 54553 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
AMD EPYC 7543 | | Single-Core | 1516 | 1391 | | Multi-Core | 43596 | 30306 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
AMD EPYC 7543 | | Announcement date | March 08, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Desktop | Server | | Socket | sWRX8 | SP3 | | Core name | Chagall PRO | Milan | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 3 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2.7 MHz | 2.8 MHz | | Cores | 64 | 32 | | Threads | 128 | 64 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 22600 millions | 68000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 225 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 4MB | | | L2 cache | 32MB | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000444 | 100-000000345
100-100000319WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7543 is 3% better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has 32 more core than EPYC 7543. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is better: 27
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7543 is better: 4
However, it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and AMD EPYC 7543 before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7643
|
