 |
AMD EPYC 7473X vs AMD EPYC 7543 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7473X vs AMD EPYC 7543 and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, streaming, video editing, rendering, programming. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Blender, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, PassMark, 7zip, WPrime, Handbrake, Prime95, 3DMark, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, RealBench, PCMark 10.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7543 or AMD EPYC 7473X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7473X | 67% |
EPYC 7543 | 66% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7473X is 1% better than EPYC 7543. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7473X | 74% |
EPYC 7543 | 67% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 130.7 | 118.9 | | Valorant | 148.5 | 135.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 83.2 | 75.7 | | Apex Legends | 139.6 | 127.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 111.4 | 101.3 | | Overwatch | 120.3 | 109.5 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 102.5 | 93.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 74.3 | 67.6 | | Warzone | 115.8 | 105.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 124.8 | 113.5 | | Valheim | 123.3 | 112.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7473X | 20% |
EPYC 7543 | 20% |
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
AMD EPYC 7543 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 170 | 164 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7201 | 6747 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 322 | 307 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 15268 | 14301 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 804 | 756 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 39707 | 37190 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
AMD EPYC 7543 | | Single-Core | 1812 | 1592 | | Multi-Core | 58245 | 54553 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
AMD EPYC 7543 | | Single-Core | 1489 | 1391 | | Multi-Core | 41864 | 30306 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7473X |
AMD EPYC 7543 | | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Milan | Milan | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 3 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 2.8 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 32 | | Threads | 48 | 64 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 68000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 225 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000507
100-000000507​WOF | 100-000000345
100-100000319WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that EPYC 7543 has 8 more core than EPYC 7473X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7473X is better: 24
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7543 is better: 4
Although it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7473X and AMD EPYC 7543 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7473X Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7543 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
