|
AMD EPYC 7543 vs Intel Core i9-10940X |
|
Processor comparisons 25-03-2021 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 7543 vs Intel Core i9-10940X tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, machine learning, streaming, rendering, video editing. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like UserBenchmark, WPrime, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, Blender, PassMark, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, Prime95, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, Furmark, PCMark 10. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10940X or AMD EPYC 7543.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7543 | 66% |
Core i9-10940X | 58% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7543 is 12% better than Core i9-10940X. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7543 | 67% |
Core i9-10940X | 59% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Control, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 118.9 | 104.3 | Valorant | 135.1 | 118.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 75.7 | 66.4 | Apex Legends | 127.0 | 111.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 101.3 | 88.9 | Overwatch | 109.5 | 96.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 93.2 | 81.8 | DOOM Eternal | 67.6 | 59.2 | Warzone | 105.4 | 92.4 | Assassin's Creed | 113.5 | 99.5 | Valheim | 112.2 | 98.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7543 | 20% |
Core i9-10940X | 24% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-10940X is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7543 since it has less power consumption: 225W vs. 165W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7543 |
Intel Core i9-10940X | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 164 | 201 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6747 | 3117 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 307 | 442 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14301 | 7609 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 756 | 1263 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 37190 | 21309 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7543 |
Intel Core i9-10940X | Single-Core | 1592 | 2704 | Multi-Core | 54553 | 29374 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7543 |
Intel Core i9-10940X | Single-Core | 1391 | 1226 | Multi-Core | 30306 | 15950 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7543 |
Intel Core i9-10940X | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | October 01, 2019 | Type | Server | Desktop | Socket | SP3 | FCLGA2066 | Core name | Milan | Cascade Lake | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | Generation | 3 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 4.8 MHz | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Cores | 32 | 14 | Threads | 64 | 28 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s DMI3 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 68000 millions | 9200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 165 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | | 256 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 94 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 19.25 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000345 100-100000319WOF
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-10940X is 15% better than EPYC 7543 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7543 has 18 more core than Core i9-10940X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7543 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10940X is better: 12 However, it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7543 and Intel Core i9-10940X before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7543 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Core i9-10940X Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
| |
|