Processor comparisons 25-03-2021
For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 7543 vs AMD EPYC 7742 and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, programming, rendering, machine learning. Here you can find all information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Geekbench 5.2, Blender, Prime95, PassMark, SuperPi, Furmark, WPrime, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, Handbrake, 7zip, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7742 or AMD EPYC 7543.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7543 | 80% |
EPYC 7742 | 87% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7742 is 8% better than EPYC 7543. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7543 | 76% |
EPYC 7742 | 92% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 134.8 | 163.1 | | Valorant | 153.2 | 185.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 85.8 | 103.8 | | Apex Legends | 144.0 | 174.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 114.9 | 139.0 | | Overwatch | 124.1 | 150.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 105.7 | 127.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 76.6 | 92.7 | | Warzone | 119.5 | 144.6 | | Assassin's Creed | 128.7 | 155.7 | | Valheim | 127.2 | 153.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7543 | 20% |
EPYC 7742 | 16% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7543 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7742 as it consumes less power: 225W vs. 225W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7543 |
AMD EPYC 7742 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 164 | 202 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6747 | 8334 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 307 | 398 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14301 | 20644 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 756 | 933 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 37190 | 45938 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7543 |
AMD EPYC 7742 | | Single-Core | 1592 | 2352 | | Multi-Core | 54553 | 67386 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7543 |
AMD EPYC 7742 | | Single-Core | 1391 | 1091 | | Multi-Core | 30306 | 48624 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7543 |
AMD EPYC 7742 | | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | April 01, 2019 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Milan | Rome | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 3 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.4 MHz | | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 2.25 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 64 | | Threads | 64 | 128 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 68000 millions | 86000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 225 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000345
100-100000319WOF
| 100-000000053
100-100000053WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7543 is 19% better than EPYC 7742 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7742 has 32 more core than EPYC 7543. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7543 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7742 is better: 23
The summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7543 and AMD EPYC 7742 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7543
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7742
• Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Core i9-12900KF Vs EPYC 7742
• EPYC 7513 Vs EPYC 7742
|
