|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H vs AMD EPYC 7543 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-04-2023 If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H vs AMD EPYC 7543 and decide which is better for games or simple use for programming, video editing, machine learning, streaming, rendering. Here you can find useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, PCMark 10, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, RealBench, Prime95, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, Gears 5, PassMark, Blender. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7543 or Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon Platinum 8444H | 65% |
EPYC 7543 | 66% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7543 is 1% better than Xeon Platinum 8444H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon Platinum 8444H | 67% |
EPYC 7543 | 67% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 119.1 | 118.9 | Valorant | 135.3 | 135.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 75.8 | 75.7 | Apex Legends | 127.2 | 127.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 101.5 | 101.3 | Overwatch | 109.6 | 109.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 93.4 | 93.2 | DOOM Eternal | 67.6 | 67.6 | Warzone | 105.5 | 105.4 | Assassin's Creed | 113.6 | 113.5 | Valheim | 112.3 | 112.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon Platinum 8444H | 15% |
EPYC 7543 | 20% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7543 is more energy efficient than the Xeon Platinum 8444H as it consumes less power: 270W vs. 225W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 7543 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 1096 | 164 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3538 | 6747 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 2432 | 307 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8731 | 14301 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1693 | 756 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 49703 | 37190 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 7543 | Single-Core | 15433 | 1592 | Multi-Core | 50595 | 54553 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 7543 | Single-Core | 1270 | 1391 | Multi-Core | 30447 | 30306 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 7543 | Announcement date | March 19, 2023 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Milan | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | Generation | 4 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 2.8 MHz | Cores | 16 | 32 | Threads | 32 | 64 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 68000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 270 W | 225 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 45 MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | 100-000000345 100-100000319WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Platinum 8444H is 3% better than EPYC 7543 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7543 has 16 more core than Xeon Platinum 8444H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H is better: 24
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7543 is better: 10 However, it should be realized that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H and AMD EPYC 7543 before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7543 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|