Processor comparisons 10-01-2022 If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i9-12900F vs AMD EPYC 7543 and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, programming, streaming, video editing. Here you can find useful information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like RealBench, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Geekbench 5.2, WPrime, UserBenchmark, 7zip, AIDA64, PassMark, Prime95, Gears 5, Furmark, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, Handbrake, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Blender, Blender. Gaming performance of processors in: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7543 or Intel Core i9-12900F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
Core i9-12900F | 74% |
EPYC 7543 | 75% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7543 is 1% better than Core i9-12900F. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-12900F | 64% |
EPYC 7543 | 76% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, Control.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 113.0 | 134.8 | Valorant | 128.4 | 153.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 71.9 | 85.8 | Apex Legends | 120.7 | 144.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.3 | 114.9 | Overwatch | 104.0 | 124.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.6 | 105.7 | DOOM Eternal | 64.2 | 76.6 | Warzone | 100.2 | 119.5 | Assassin's Creed | 107.9 | 128.7 | Valheim | 106.6 | 127.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-12900F | 97% |
EPYC 7543 | 20% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900F is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7543 as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 225W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-12900F |
AMD EPYC 7543 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 449 | 164 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4734 | 6747 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 750 | 307 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10524 | 14301 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2661 | 756 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 30285 | 37190 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900F |
AMD EPYC 7543 | Single-Core | 6936 | 1592 | Multi-Core | 51775 | 54553 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900F |
AMD EPYC 7543 | Single-Core | 1904 | 1391 | Multi-Core | 16188 | 30306 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-12900F |
AMD EPYC 7543 | Announcement date | July 21, 2021 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | FCLGA1700 | SP3 | Core name | Alder Lake | Milan | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | Generation | 12 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 5.1 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 2.8 MHz | Cores | 16 | 32 | Threads | 24 | 64 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 12600 millions | 68000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 225 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 12 MB | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | 100-000000345 100-100000319WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900F is 26% better than EPYC 7543 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7543 has 16 more core than Core i9-12900F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900F is better: 17
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7543 is better: 19 However, it should be realized that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i9-12900F and AMD EPYC 7543 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K
• Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7543
|